2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.064414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface pinning on magnetic nanostuctures

Abstract: Magnetic nanostructures are often considered as highly functional materials because they exhibit unusual magnetic properties under different external conditions. We study the effect of surface pinning on the core-shell magnetic nanostuctures of different shapes and sizes considering the spininteraction to be Ising-like. We explore the hysteresis properties and find that the exchange bias, even under zero field cooled conditions, increases with increase of, the pinning density and the fraction of up-spins among… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, positive EB occurred with more pinning of down spins (↓) at the CS interface. Also, in the case of FN when shell is antiferromagnetically ordered, the spin pinning is less effective and the intrinsic field produced by the system is negligible 59 . It is well known that the amount of AFM uncompensated spins at the interface totally influence the phenomenon of the EB effect 19 , 60 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, positive EB occurred with more pinning of down spins (↓) at the CS interface. Also, in the case of FN when shell is antiferromagnetically ordered, the spin pinning is less effective and the intrinsic field produced by the system is negligible 59 . It is well known that the amount of AFM uncompensated spins at the interface totally influence the phenomenon of the EB effect 19 , 60 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier works 38,48,49 had poined out that positive exchange bias results from competition between antiferromagnetic exchange coupling across ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic interface (i.e., negative J int ) and ferromagnetic coupling between applied field and antiferromagnetic moment at the interface. However, as shown in our earlier theoretical work 30 , neither in two-dimensional nor in threedimensional spin structure, variation of J int (including switch in J int from positive to negative) has any significant impact on the exchange bias for Ising, XY, and Heisenberg spins. The role of J int in governing the sign and magnitude of exchange bias could be significant in nanoscale core-shell structures where the core is ferromagnetic and the shell is antiferromagnetic and the measurement is carried out, primarily, under field-cooled condition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…All these results could be rationalized by resorting to the concept of surface spin pinning effect in nanoparticles 30 . Using Monte Carlo simulations, the magnetic hysteresis loops for different nanoparticle aggregate structures have been obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,26 When the system is examined under eld cooling conditions, the anisotropy of AFM is expected to be modied due to the interface effect of the FiM/ AFM system, and essentially, uncompensated spins at the interface are either pinned or unpinned with respect to FiM spins. 27 Therefore, the consequence of the shi in hysteresis loop and the amplication of the coercive eld are expected to originate from the pinned and unpinned uncompensated spins of AFM at the magnetically disordered interface. When the sample is under eld cooling, unpinned spins are dragged and rotate along the eld direction providing an extra magnetization to FiM, which leads to the coercivity enhancement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%