2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface morphology on the optical properties of InAs/Ge (1 1 1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, among all of the samples studied here, STOPM (1:1) shows the lowest values of n . It is known that dielectric constant/refractive index values reduce with nanostructurization because of the quantum confinement effect . STOPM (1:1) shows a value lower than that of STOPM (1:5) and STOPM (1:10) because of nanorod formation with varying sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, among all of the samples studied here, STOPM (1:1) shows the lowest values of n . It is known that dielectric constant/refractive index values reduce with nanostructurization because of the quantum confinement effect . STOPM (1:1) shows a value lower than that of STOPM (1:5) and STOPM (1:10) because of nanorod formation with varying sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%