Effect of surface conditioning methods, adhesive systems and resin composite on repair strength of dimethacrylate and silorane resin composites

Abstract

(2016). Effect of surface conditioning methods, adhesive systems and resin composite on repair strength of dimethacrylate and silorane resin composites. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 30(24)

Bond strength repair of a bulk-fill composite using different adhesive systems and resin composites

“…The sample size was determined by preliminary tests comparing with previous values published (Lima et al, 2016), in which that number of specimens yielded adequate power at α = 0.05, this sample size reached a power of 1 for detecting statistically significant differences. Data normality and homogeneity were verified by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively.…”

“…Success in repair procedures depends on obtaining an adequate adhesive interface between the aged and new resin composite. Several studies (Baur & Ilie, 2013;Lima et al, 2014;Baena et al, 2015;Ahmadizenouz et al, 2016;Lima et al, 2016;Fornazari et al, 2017) showed that the combination between the surface treatment to be repaired and the use of adhesive systems increase the bond strength between the composites. In this study, it was simulated restorations performed using a bulkfill resin composite and evaluated the bond strength of repairs performed with different adhesive systems and resin composites.…”

Repair bond strength of dental computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufactured ceramics after different surface treatments

“…Silane is then applied to form a bond with the bonding agent 49 . Other studies 53‐57 showed that applying coupling agent followed by TSC improved bond strength of the ceramics. In our study, this technique failed to improve the microtensile bond strength to all CAD/CAM ceramic groups, consistent with others 58 .…”