2012
DOI: 10.3329/jafmc.v7i2.10387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect Of Surface Area Of Dialyzer Membrane On The Adequacy Of Haemodialysis

Abstract: Conclusion: This study reveals, adequacy of dialysis can be increased by increasing the surface area of the dialyzer membrane. So, considering the poor socioeconomic condition of Bangladesh and patients' convenience, a short duration, low cost dialysis regime can be tried by increasing the surface area of dialyzer membrane.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemodialyzers with smaller surface area are known to give less adequate hemodialysis than those having larger surface area. is was shown in a study done in Bangladesh where they found that increasing the surface area of a dialyzer membrane (from 1.2 to 1.3 m 2 ) increased the adequacy of hemodialysis by 10.4% (by URR criteria) and 19.7% (by Kt/V criteria) [30]. Similarly, Panagoutsos et al showed that increasing the surface area of the dialyzer membrane from 1.15 m 2 ± 0.1 to 1.7 m 2 increased the Kt/V from 0.93 ± 0.19 to 1.55 ± 2.9 (p < 0.05) and URR from 52 ± 8% to 71 ± 7% (p < 0.05); that is, there was 66.7% and 36% increment in Kt/V and URR, respectively [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Hemodialyzers with smaller surface area are known to give less adequate hemodialysis than those having larger surface area. is was shown in a study done in Bangladesh where they found that increasing the surface area of a dialyzer membrane (from 1.2 to 1.3 m 2 ) increased the adequacy of hemodialysis by 10.4% (by URR criteria) and 19.7% (by Kt/V criteria) [30]. Similarly, Panagoutsos et al showed that increasing the surface area of the dialyzer membrane from 1.15 m 2 ± 0.1 to 1.7 m 2 increased the Kt/V from 0.93 ± 0.19 to 1.55 ± 2.9 (p < 0.05) and URR from 52 ± 8% to 71 ± 7% (p < 0.05); that is, there was 66.7% and 36% increment in Kt/V and URR, respectively [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although sufficient literature is available on measuring hemodialysis adequacy and the factors responsible for it but very few has compared the effect of dialyzer surface area on the adequacy of hemodialysis. Reference [8] had done a similar study in Bangladesh, however their study was restricted to measuring adequacy in single dialysis session by URR and single pool (Kt/V) while increasing surface area of dialyzers and they did not couple this to decreasing frequency of hemodialysis per week. Their results came significant (p value < 0.001) and they concluded that single session adequacy can be increased by increasing the surface area of dialyzers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The passage of the uremic solutes via the membrane surface is strongly affected by differences in the inter-membrane diffusion rate, solubility of solutes, electrical charge density, and polarity on the surface of the intact membrane Technological advances in membrane chemical compositions; dialyzer design and sterilization techniques have led to improved performance of dialyzer and prolong survival time of ESRD patients. Currently, different types of dialyzers are commercially available in the market, and they can be classified in terms of membrane chemical composition, membrane surface area and membrane permeability to water or different blood proteins such as middle molecules (ß2-microglobulin) (Chowdhury et al, 2012;Daugirdas et al, 2012;Nissenson and Fine, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%