2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.134929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sulfur precursors on hydrothermal growth of MoS2 nanostructures and its visible-light-driven photocatalytic activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…72 This eco-friendly approach eliminates the need for pH control and complexing agents. Through this method, FeS 2 , 73 CuS, 74 Ag 2 S, 75 MoS, 76 and CdS 77 are prepared. NPs are synthesized by heating a mixture of metal salts and sulfide sources.…”
Section: Synthetic Approaches For Metal Sulfide Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 This eco-friendly approach eliminates the need for pH control and complexing agents. Through this method, FeS 2 , 73 CuS, 74 Ag 2 S, 75 MoS, 76 and CdS 77 are prepared. NPs are synthesized by heating a mixture of metal salts and sulfide sources.…”
Section: Synthetic Approaches For Metal Sulfide Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only electrochemical charge storage, but also the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution (HER) performance is dependent on MoS2 crystal structure and morphology [18]. This led to the exploration of various hydrothermal synthesis routes controlling MoS2 structure by choice of sulfur-precursor [19][20][21][22]. Liu et al found that thioacetamide (TAA) and L-cysteine (LC) possess lower decomposition temperatures than thiourea (TU), thereby releasing sulfur more readily, leading to smaller particle sizes and the tendency to form the 1T-polytype, which in turn, leads to a favorable HER activity [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%