2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(99)00038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sulfur dioxide on flotation of chalcopyrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the Cu/Fe has open unsaturated bonding ability, the water molecules are completely likely to be attached to these active sites, which was supported by the adsorption energy of water molecule on CuFeS 2 -001 (−15.7 kcal/mol), as listed in Table . Besides, Chandler and Walker had reported that the surface hydrophobicity of chalcopyrite should be ascribed to the exposed copper–sulfur (Cu–S)-rich and S-rich layer resulted from the oxidation of chalcopyrite surface. , This issue has not been included in this work and would be further considered in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the Cu/Fe has open unsaturated bonding ability, the water molecules are completely likely to be attached to these active sites, which was supported by the adsorption energy of water molecule on CuFeS 2 -001 (−15.7 kcal/mol), as listed in Table . Besides, Chandler and Walker had reported that the surface hydrophobicity of chalcopyrite should be ascribed to the exposed copper–sulfur (Cu–S)-rich and S-rich layer resulted from the oxidation of chalcopyrite surface. , This issue has not been included in this work and would be further considered in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides, Chandler and Walker had reported that the surface hydrophobicity of chalcopyrite should be ascribed to the exposed copper−sulfur (Cu−S)-rich and S-rich layer resulted from the oxidation of chalcopyrite surface. 73,74 This issue has not been included in this work and would be further considered in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalcopyrite is known to exhibit inherent floatability yet thiol collectors are always used in the industrial applications for the separation of complex sulfide ores by flotation. In a complex sulfide ore flotation, the recovery of a particular sulfide mineral is usually affected by the choice of surface modifying agents and the collector [21]. The choice of collectors can be made on the basis of the mineralogy of the ore, metallurgical objectives, and the operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of the alkyl xanthate collectors with platinum and gold, copper, lead, silver, , and mineral surfaces such as chalcocite, , pyrite and chalcopyrite, galena, ,,, and a mixture of chalcocite and bornite has also been investigated. In these studies, both electrochemical techniques (cyclic voltammetry, ,,,,, open circuit potential, , potential step, , nanoelectrogravimetric, and contact angle 10,13,14 measurements) and surface characterization techniques (Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ,,, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), ,,, surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy (SERS), and UV−visible spectroscopy 8,10,14 ) were employed to obtain insight into the nature of the electrochemical processes and to identify the products formed on the electrode surface under the different experimental conditions assayed. In general, the mechanisms by means of which the collectors act on the metal or mineral electrode surface can be expressed by the following global reactions: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The interaction of the alkyl xanthate collectors with platinum and gold, 3 copper, [3][4][5][6][7][8] lead, 9 silver, 10,11 and mineral surfaces such as chalcocite, 4,12 pyrite and chalcopyrite, [12][13][14] galena, 3,12,15,16 and a mixture of chalcocite and bornite 17 has also been investigated. In these studies, both electrochemical techniques (cyclic voltammetry, [2][3][4][5][6]9,10,12,13,17 open circuit potential, 4,10 potential step, 6,10 nanoelectrogravimetric, 6 and contact angle 10,13,14 measurements) and surface characterization techniques (Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 5,8,10,12 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), 7,11,15,16 surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy (SERS), 11 and UV-visible spectroscopy 8,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%