2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.137838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate temperature on properties of co-evaporated copper antimony sulfide thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other possible reason may be, the rate of the deposition reaction increases resulting in the coalesce of the smaller grains into effectively larger grain [46,47]. With further increase in the substrate temperature beyond 200 °C, the scattering of the atoms takes place which may reduce the formation of clusters resulting in a smaller crystallite size [48]. Devarajan et al [49] observed similar behavior in the growth of crystallites for the CdSe thin films with the increase in the substrate temperature.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other possible reason may be, the rate of the deposition reaction increases resulting in the coalesce of the smaller grains into effectively larger grain [46,47]. With further increase in the substrate temperature beyond 200 °C, the scattering of the atoms takes place which may reduce the formation of clusters resulting in a smaller crystallite size [48]. Devarajan et al [49] observed similar behavior in the growth of crystallites for the CdSe thin films with the increase in the substrate temperature.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper indium gallium selenide (CuInGaSe) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin film solar cells have demonstrated efficiencies of 21.5% and 21.7%, respectively 13 , 14 . However, these materials have several disadvantages, such as low elemental abundance 15 , high cost, and toxicity of elements such as Cd and Te 16 . These disadvantages have significantly hindered the widespread deployment of these materials as photovoltaic devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copperzinc tin sulfoselenide (CZTSSe) was explored as a promising alternative material because it might fulfill the prerequisites for sufficient solar irradiation but still, the efficiency of PV devices is relatively low, despite more than a decade of painstaking researches [4]. The copper-based chalcogenide systems including CuSbS2 (Chalcostibite), Cu3SbS4 (Famatinite), Cu12Sb4S13 (Tetrahedrite), and Cu3SbS3 (Skinnerite) phases have been explored as they are interesting alternatives for CIGS thin-film solar cells due to their low-toxicity and earthabundant absorber components [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The Cu-Sb-S system compounds are p-type semiconductors with optical band gap (Eg) ranging between 0.5 and 2.0 eV and a large absorption coefficient over 10 4 cm −1 at visible wavelengths, which shows a comparable efficiency (i.e., 22.9%) to that of CIGS and CZTSSe [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%