2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate ratio on biogas yield for anaerobic co-digestion of fruit vegetable waste & sugarcane bagasse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 5) was further compared with conceptual models where the individual fractions of plant components are given different biodegradability values, considering their properties. The equations depart from an overall equation assigning different biodegradability properties to cellulose (C i ), hemicellulose (H i ), and the cell solubles (CS i ), as shown in Equation (7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation ( 5) was further compared with conceptual models where the individual fractions of plant components are given different biodegradability values, considering their properties. The equations depart from an overall equation assigning different biodegradability properties to cellulose (C i ), hemicellulose (H i ), and the cell solubles (CS i ), as shown in Equation (7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, crops and agroresidues are interesting co-digestion materials supplementing waste materials of inferior energy quality, such as animal manure, allowing us to increase the energy output per unit reactor volume [5,6]. In addition, the AD potentials from fruit 2 of 23 and vegetable waste has also been analyzed, considering its biogas yield [7] and its use as single AD component [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sugar bagasse (SB), and easily biodegradable waste, i.e. fruit vegetable waste (FVW), at a ratio 70% FVW-30% SB allowed for increasing the kinetic constant from 0.0023 days -1 (100% SB) to 0.022 days -1 (70% FVW-30% SB) (Vats et al, 2019). This increase is much higher than that observed in the present work when the OMSW (k=0.17 days -1, for 100% OMSW) was codigested with D. salina at a ratio (95% OMSW-5% D. salina) (k=0.19 days -1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified Gompertz model [27][28][29] equation was used for kinetic modelling. Equation (1) was fitted to experimental methane production data.…”
Section: Methane Production Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%