2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate and Zn doping on the structural, optical and electrical properties of CdS thin films prepared by CBD method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRD patterns showed (100), (002), (110) and (112) peaks corresponding to hexagonal phase (figure 2(a)). Similar results have been reported by Ligang et al [18] and Kumar et al [19]. These groups have studied the effect of zinc incorporation on CdS films obtained by CBD and vacuum deposition techniques respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The XRD patterns showed (100), (002), (110) and (112) peaks corresponding to hexagonal phase (figure 2(a)). Similar results have been reported by Ligang et al [18] and Kumar et al [19]. These groups have studied the effect of zinc incorporation on CdS films obtained by CBD and vacuum deposition techniques respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The number of crystallites per unit area (N) is in the range of (0.27-4.89) × 10 17 m −2 , increased with the increase of Zn dopant in CdS due to decrease in crystallite size of the films. Similar results have been reported by Ligang Ma et al [24] for Zn doped CdS thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition method. The microstrain (ε), dislocation density (δ) and stacking fault probability (α S ) of the films were calculated from the equations as reported in earlier literature [25,26].…”
Section: Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It shows clearly that, regardless of the deposition time, all the CdS films deposited in only one run present low crystalline ratios indicating the poor crystallinity of the films. This behavior can be attributed to the amorphous structure of the glass substrate [37,38]. However, the figure shows also that the (111) peak intensity of each sample increases speedily as the number of runs is 3 International Journal of Photoenergy increased.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 95%