1981
DOI: 10.2320/jinstmet1952.45.3_276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Substitutional Alloying Elements on the Diffusion Coefficient of Hydrogen in α-Iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation energy, as well as the diffusivity of hydrogen, in pure iron and steel has been measured extensively by electrochemical-permeation, [4][5][6][7][8] gas-permeation, [9][10][11][12] and isothermal-desorption [13,14] experiments at a certain temperature. Activation energies for diffusion that were estimated by permeation and desorption experiments at different temperatures have been well documented for defect-free iron [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15] and steels containing traps like substitutional atoms, [7,8,16,17] dislocations, [18] and a few cases of second-phase particles like cementite. [19,20,21] The activation energy for hydrogen to diffuse in a normal iron lattice was reported to be very small, ranging from 5.69 to 7.12 kJ/mol, depending on the measurement method and sample-surface treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation energy, as well as the diffusivity of hydrogen, in pure iron and steel has been measured extensively by electrochemical-permeation, [4][5][6][7][8] gas-permeation, [9][10][11][12] and isothermal-desorption [13,14] experiments at a certain temperature. Activation energies for diffusion that were estimated by permeation and desorption experiments at different temperatures have been well documented for defect-free iron [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15] and steels containing traps like substitutional atoms, [7,8,16,17] dislocations, [18] and a few cases of second-phase particles like cementite. [19,20,21] The activation energy for hydrogen to diffuse in a normal iron lattice was reported to be very small, ranging from 5.69 to 7.12 kJ/mol, depending on the measurement method and sample-surface treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. In addition, the data obtained by the other researchers [13][14][15] were plotted in the figure. The figure indicated that the present values were almost involved in the line of the data obtained by the other researchers, and then confirmed that the present transient of i H was validly measured.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficients Of Hydrogen In the Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10). Equation (13) indicates that a larger C 0 / θ ad leads a larger k + 10 / k − 10 , meaning acceleration of hydrogen absorption rate or suppression of hydrogen desorption rate. A cathodic current density on the hydrogen absorption surface, i c , defines generally as follows,…”
Section: Estimation Of Hydrogen Absorption Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some pure metals and alloys Arrhenius plots of the diffusion coefficients cannot be represented by straight lines. This is caused by (i) lattice transformation (1) and magnetic transformation(2), i.e., the change in the activation energy of hydrogen diffusion and (ii) the effect of impurities (alloying elements)(3)- (5) and lattice imperfections(6)(7), i.e., the existence of several kinds of the activation energy of hydrogen diffusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%