2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substitution of rare earth by mischmetal on the devitrification process of Al–X–Ni–Co (X=Y, Ce, Mm) alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A distinct glass transition phenomenon, at around 548 K, is observed for the bottom part of the deposit but the top part shows no prominent glass transition. The melt-spun amorphous ribbon displays three exothermic peaks for the present alloy, as it has also been reported by other investigators [16][17]. The first peak at around 573 K is attributed to the precipitation of nanosized (10-20 nm) fcc-Al phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A distinct glass transition phenomenon, at around 548 K, is observed for the bottom part of the deposit but the top part shows no prominent glass transition. The melt-spun amorphous ribbon displays three exothermic peaks for the present alloy, as it has also been reported by other investigators [16][17]. The first peak at around 573 K is attributed to the precipitation of nanosized (10-20 nm) fcc-Al phase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Al 88 Mm 88 Ni 5 Fe 2 alloy was chosen for this study, where Mm denotes Mischmetal, which is a mixture of different lanthanides. The use of Mm highly reduces the cost of the alloy, without any big effect on the crystallisation process, with respect to the compositions containing pure rare earth elements [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the Bragg peaks was very similar to those of AlCeNi and Ce 3 Al that have been reported previously in XRD patterns obtained from arc-melted Mm 55 Al 25 Ni 10 Cu 10 master alloy 17 . This is due to the fact that Mm, which is constituted of the elements Ce, La, Nd and Pr, exhibits crystallization properties very similar to those of Mm alloy; hence, no remarkable differences are detectable between the XRD patterns of samples annealed at equivalent stages of crystallization 20 . Figure 4 shows a typical backscatter SEM micrograph of the as-cast (Mm 55 Al 25 Ni 10 Cu 10 ) sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%