2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of structural order on oxidation kinetics and oxide phase evolution of Al–Zr alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that oxide-layer growth at these relatively low temperatures occurs by synchronous oxidation of Zr and Al from the parent alloy, which complies with the much higher O affinities of Zr and Al as compared to Cu, as well as the deep minimum for the Gibbs energy of formation of the amorphous am-(AlO1.5)y(ZrO2)1-y phase of fixed composition y = 0.33 (corresponding to (Zr0.67Al0.33)O1.83), as predicted in the previous study of oxidation of amorphous Al-Zr alloys [25]. As shown in our previous work on the oxidation of crystalline and amorphous binary Al-Zr alloys [22], the formation of an amorphous (Zr,Al)-oxide layer (with the same Al/Zr-ratio J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f as compared to the alloy) results from the continuous dissolution of O into the amorphous alloy matrix at the oxide growth front. Oxide nucleation is triggered if the solubility product zone for the formation of the am-(AlO1.5)y(ZrO2)1-y phase in the O-dissolution zone is exceeded.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Oxide Layerssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that oxide-layer growth at these relatively low temperatures occurs by synchronous oxidation of Zr and Al from the parent alloy, which complies with the much higher O affinities of Zr and Al as compared to Cu, as well as the deep minimum for the Gibbs energy of formation of the amorphous am-(AlO1.5)y(ZrO2)1-y phase of fixed composition y = 0.33 (corresponding to (Zr0.67Al0.33)O1.83), as predicted in the previous study of oxidation of amorphous Al-Zr alloys [25]. As shown in our previous work on the oxidation of crystalline and amorphous binary Al-Zr alloys [22], the formation of an amorphous (Zr,Al)-oxide layer (with the same Al/Zr-ratio J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f as compared to the alloy) results from the continuous dissolution of O into the amorphous alloy matrix at the oxide growth front. Oxide nucleation is triggered if the solubility product zone for the formation of the am-(AlO1.5)y(ZrO2)1-y phase in the O-dissolution zone is exceeded.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Oxide Layerssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The pre-deposited ultra-thin (thickness: 2-3 nm) inert Au markers remained on top of the oxide surface, instead of being buried within or below the thickening oxide overlayer. This suggests that oxide-layer growth occurred mainly at the interface between the developing oxide layer and the parent alloy (further designated as the oxide growth front) through inward diffusion of oxygen anions (with concurrent outward diffusion of anion vacancies, as generated at the oxide/alloy interface by continuous dissolution of oxygen into the parent alloy), in accordance with the oxidation mechanism for pure Zr metal [54,55] and Zr-Al alloys [22].…”
Section: Depth-resolved Oxide Composition By Aes Depth Profilingmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the oxygen affinity of Gd is the highest among the constituent elements [10,17,18], the formation of Gd oxide may require long-range diffusion that prevents its formation at lower temperature. Therefore, Zr is easier to react with oxygen to form ZrO 2 layer over the surface by inward diffusion of oxygen [19][20][21].…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%