2004
DOI: 10.1299/kikaia.70.1405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Stress Ratio on Fatigue Properties and Propsition of Fatigue Life Evaluation Method under High Stress Ratio for Ti-6Al-4V Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress ratio conditions of 1, 0.01, and 0.5 were chosen and the tests under conditions in which the maximum stress was fixed at 0.2% proof stress [3] (hereafter referred to as the max = 0.2 test) were also performed. The fatigue test specimens had an hourglass shape with a minimum diameter of 4.5 mm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stress ratio conditions of 1, 0.01, and 0.5 were chosen and the tests under conditions in which the maximum stress was fixed at 0.2% proof stress [3] (hereafter referred to as the max = 0.2 test) were also performed. The fatigue test specimens had an hourglass shape with a minimum diameter of 4.5 mm, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified Goodman diagram is generally used to evaluate this effect because it is simple to use and produces a safe-side evaluation in many materials. However, it has been reported that the modified Goodman line for Ti-6Al-4V alloy enters the dangerous side near R = 0 at ambient temperature [1][2][3][4]. Judging from these reports on Ti-6Al-4V alloy, it seems necessary to confirm the validity of the modified Goodman diagram for this forging, especially at low temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences are also reported in hydrogen effects [41][42][43], mean stress effects [44][45][46] and size effects [47][48][49][50][51]. Figure 8 shows typical fatigue test results for hydrogen-charged specimens of low-alloy steels [42].…”
Section: The Characteristics Of Internal Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 98%