2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of stress concentration factors on the structural integrity assessment of multi-planar offshore tubular DKT-joints based on the fracture mechanics fatigue reliability approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative way to obtain SCFs is to use FEA modelling, which is a powerful method to identify the locations of critical points and is ideally suited for the calculation of SCFs in complex geometries. Due to its accuracy and high fidelity, FEA has been increasingly used for the calculation of SCFs in offshore welded structures (Woghiren and Brennan 2009, Hellier et al 2014, Ahmadi et al, 2011a, 2011bLee, 1999). Considering its accuracy, the FEA approach is chosen in this study to calculate SCFs in offshore welded structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative way to obtain SCFs is to use FEA modelling, which is a powerful method to identify the locations of critical points and is ideally suited for the calculation of SCFs in complex geometries. Due to its accuracy and high fidelity, FEA has been increasingly used for the calculation of SCFs in offshore welded structures (Woghiren and Brennan 2009, Hellier et al 2014, Ahmadi et al, 2011a, 2011bLee, 1999). Considering its accuracy, the FEA approach is chosen in this study to calculate SCFs in offshore welded structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the FM approach, the relationship between crack growth rate and stress intensity factor can be developed using the Paris law as [6], ∆ (1) Where and represent the crack size and the number of load cycles, respectively. Moreover, and are the crack growth parameters, which depend on the material properties and loading conditions [7], [8]. In this equation, ∆ represents the stress intensity range which can be defined as [9],…”
Section: Fatigue Reliability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where ∆ and represent the stress range and the geometry function, respectively. In general, the geometry function depends on the crack geometry, structural geometry, and loading [8]. By plugging Eq.…”
Section: Fatigue Reliability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajasankar et al [4] who applied the reliability analysis to the structural integrity assessment of offshore tubular joints used the log-normal distribution for the SCF with the mean and standard deviation of 10.118 and 2.024, respectively. Ahmadi and Lotfollahi-Yaghin [5] and Ahmadi et al [6] performed fatigue reliability analyses, based on stress-life (S-N) and fracture mechanics (FM) approaches, on two-planar tubular DKT-joints under axial loading. In these papers, a log-normal distribution was assumed for the SCF with the mean and standard deviation of 2.75 and 0.4125, respectively.…”
Section: Assumed Distributions For the Scfs In The Reliability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%