2006
DOI: 10.1680/geot.2006.56.7.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of strain rate on mobilised strength and thickness of curved shear bands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drag coefficients C d is the intercept of C n and can be expressed as 0.6/sin θ for any impact angle, which was also suggested by Randolph and White (2012). It should be noted that the values N p,90 ¼ 11.61 and f a,0 ¼1.527 are close to the theoretical values of 11.9 (Randolph and Houlsby, 1984;Martin and Randolph, 2006) and 1.4 (Einav and Randolph, 2006;Randolph and White, 2012) for a fully rough pipe. The deduced values of the bearing factor N p and frictional coefficient f a based on CFD data are summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Slurrysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The drag coefficients C d is the intercept of C n and can be expressed as 0.6/sin θ for any impact angle, which was also suggested by Randolph and White (2012). It should be noted that the values N p,90 ¼ 11.61 and f a,0 ¼1.527 are close to the theoretical values of 11.9 (Randolph and Houlsby, 1984;Martin and Randolph, 2006) and 1.4 (Einav and Randolph, 2006;Randolph and White, 2012) for a fully rough pipe. The deduced values of the bearing factor N p and frictional coefficient f a based on CFD data are summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Slurrysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For the frictional resistance, R f2 was taken as 2R f1 from the previous reports (Einav and Randolph, 2006;Chow et al, 2014;Steiner et al, 2014). The predictions made the same assumptions based on the findings from the parametric studies, adopting _ γ ref ¼ 0.1 s À 1 and ξ a ¼0.35.…”
Section: Extended Bearing Resistance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graham et al (1983) proposed a simple equation that prescribes approximately a 5-20% increase in shear strength for each order of magnitude increase in the rate of shear strain. This effect can be expressed by the widely used equation (Einav & Randolph, 2006), and this value was adopted in the current study. For simplicity, the shear strength of a material can be assumed to be constant while integrating the constitutive equations during an individual time step of a non-linear finite-element analysis.…”
Section: Materials Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%