2002
DOI: 10.1179/026708302225004900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of strain on formation of ultrafine ferrite in surface of hot rolled microalloyed steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results published to date agree that a Ti/N ratio below the stoichiometric ratio (3.42) yields good results in to control austenite grain size, especially when precipitation takes place in the solid state as finer precipitates are obtained. [12][13][14] Previous studies on the influence of Ti on the hot flow stress during hot deformation in steels 15,16) established a quantitative dependence of the activation energy on the Ti content in the steels, without considering the precipitation state distribution, i.e. the precipitate size and precipitated volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results published to date agree that a Ti/N ratio below the stoichiometric ratio (3.42) yields good results in to control austenite grain size, especially when precipitation takes place in the solid state as finer precipitates are obtained. [12][13][14] Previous studies on the influence of Ti on the hot flow stress during hot deformation in steels 15,16) established a quantitative dependence of the activation energy on the Ti content in the steels, without considering the precipitation state distribution, i.e. the precipitate size and precipitated volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported in the literature agree that a Ti/N ratio of between 1 and 3, less than the stoichiometric ratio (3.42), provides good results in austenite grain size control, especially when precipitation takes place in the solid state, since finer precipitates are obtained. [10][11][12] Previous studies dealing with the influence of Ti on static recrystallisation kinetics 13,14) established a quantitative dependence of activation energy on the Ti content in the steel, without considering the precipitation state, i.e. the size and volume precipitated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34) It should also be noted that the value of (Q x for steel S2 was negative, and this must be interpreted in the sense that a certain amount of TiN precipitates have acted as nucleation sites for recrystallised grains, due to their greater size compared with the precipitates of other steels, except for steel S3. (12) Expression (12) establishes that the influence of the precipitation state on the activation energy for static recrystallisation may be expressed as a function of the Ti/N ratio, except if the steel contains Ti in solution, since the drag solute effect is of a different nature. Therefore, expression (12) does not take into account the Ti content in solution and would only be valid if practically all of the Ti was precipitated, as occurs in all the studied steels with the exception of steel S3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past years, it has been found that the strain, strain rate, deformation temperature and the grain size of primary austenite have great effect on the DIF during deformation or pre-deformation. [14][15][16] In addition, there are several factors such as hot holding time at high temperatures, cooling rates and annealing temperatures, might also influence on the conserving of DIF in practical hot mills. For example, the traditional finish rolling temperatures are normally higher than Ae 3 , there is a delay of about 2-5 s between deformation and subsequently cooling, and a laminar flow cooling at a rate about 20°C s Ϫ1 exists in the strip steels producing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%