2016
DOI: 10.9734/bbj/2016/24372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Stocking Density on the Performance, Carcass Yield and Meat Composition of Broiler Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present experiment the stocking density had no significant effect on carcass parameters, which is consistent with [19] , they reported that stocking density was ineffective on mortality, breast muscle size and carcass quality. The percentage of carcass, thigh, breast and abdominal fat was not affected by stocking density, which is consistent with the study of other researchers [4,21,28,29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present experiment the stocking density had no significant effect on carcass parameters, which is consistent with [19] , they reported that stocking density was ineffective on mortality, breast muscle size and carcass quality. The percentage of carcass, thigh, breast and abdominal fat was not affected by stocking density, which is consistent with the study of other researchers [4,21,28,29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reduction of performance by increasing stocking density can be due to reduced feed intake and thus Decrease received nutrients for maximum growth [3] . By increasing density, the number of birds per unit of floor space increases thus higher efficiency can be obtained, but this economic profit may be at the expense of reduced performance, hygiene and comfort of the bird [4] . In a research [5] investigated the effects of stocking density, chick's sexuality and the amount of metabolizable energy on performance and leg problems in broiler chickens, they stated that the stocking density have severe effects on the growth rate of male broiler chickens before 35 d of age, and male chickens need more space than females to reach marketing age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that some producers did not keep good records. Also, Our results in final body weight are disagreement with these reported by Ghosh et al (2012), Nogueira et al (2013), Cengiz et al (2015), Adeyemo et al (2016), Farhadi et al (2016) and Kryeziu et al (2018), in broiler chicks the average final body weight (kg) at 42 days old ranged 1.90-2.04 kg. Although our results are disagreement with Mbuza et al (2017) in mortality rate (14%) of broiler chicks before 4 weeks and after 4 weeks it drops to 9%, our explanation are agreement with those he reported.…”
Section: Housing Practicescontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…On a commercial scale, McKeith et al (2020) found no significant effect of standard stocking density (0.23 m −2 per bird) and low stocking density (0.27 m −2 per bird) in respect to the growth rate and feed efficiency of broiler chickens. The growth performance of broilers was also unaffected up to a stocking density of 14 birds m −2 in the study of Adeyemo et al (2016). A more recent study by Greene et al (2021) instead found that increasing the stocking density from 12 to 22 birds m −2 reduced the time to reach 2 kg live weight.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of High Stocking Density In Broiler Productionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, Tong et al (2012) found that the stocking density had no effect on the water loss rate, shear force and meat color of broiler meats. Adeyemo et al (2016) further reported that the proportions of prime cuts (thigh, drumstick and breast), abdominal fat and meat protein were comparable between birds on 10 and 14 birds m −2 . The carcass characteristics of broiler chickens were also unaffected up to a stocking density of 14 birds m −2 in the study of Adeyemo et al (2016).…”
Section: Negative Effects Of High Stocking Density In Broiler Productionmentioning
confidence: 86%