2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of stocking density on growth and yield of Labeo bata fingerlings reared in cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chakrabortya and Mirza [16] found survival rate of Labeo bata, 66.68 to 80.15% which was more or less similar to the present study. Yengkokpam et al [17] observed the effect of stocking density on growth and yield of Labeo bata fingerlings reared in cages and obtained survival rate 85.50a ± 0.81 to 94.07 ±0.20% that was higher than the present experiment perhaps due to variation of number and size of fingerlings, physicochemical parameters, culture period etc. Growth parameters (final weight, weight gain, final length, length gain, specific growth rate), survival rate and feed conversion ratio of Labeo bata showed significantly (P<0.05) higher in T 3 in case of stocking density of fishes were 35/m 3 compared to T 2 (71 fish/m3) and T 1 (106 fish/m3).…”
Section: Growth Performance and Productioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chakrabortya and Mirza [16] found survival rate of Labeo bata, 66.68 to 80.15% which was more or less similar to the present study. Yengkokpam et al [17] observed the effect of stocking density on growth and yield of Labeo bata fingerlings reared in cages and obtained survival rate 85.50a ± 0.81 to 94.07 ±0.20% that was higher than the present experiment perhaps due to variation of number and size of fingerlings, physicochemical parameters, culture period etc. Growth parameters (final weight, weight gain, final length, length gain, specific growth rate), survival rate and feed conversion ratio of Labeo bata showed significantly (P<0.05) higher in T 3 in case of stocking density of fishes were 35/m 3 compared to T 2 (71 fish/m3) and T 1 (106 fish/m3).…”
Section: Growth Performance and Productioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…2690.86) and benefit-cost ratio (1.14) was also found in T 2 . The most economic stocking density is the one which can yield higher biomass per unit area, highest net revenue and the highest BCR (Yengkokpam et al [17]. Increase in profit with increasing the stocking density was reported in case of Asian river catfish [37].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increase in profit with increasing stocking density was reported in case of Asian river catfish [29]. Yengkokpam et al [30] suggested that the most economic stocking density is the one which can yield higher biomass per unit area, highest net revenue and the highest BCR. Higher stocking density is better economically than the lower density reported by Zafar et al [31].…”
Section: Benefit-cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this instance, larger cost-benefit ratios and lower feed conversion ratios are taken into account when choosing an appropriate stocking density within the framework of the carp polyculture system's economic sustainability. [2][3][4]. Even if there is a negative correlation between growth and stocking density because of the competition for food and space, for example, fish placed at higher density typically have lower growth [2,5], and production [3,6], researchers are still working on optimizing the stocking densities of different aquatic species to maximize their global production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%