2011
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2011.365.375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Stocking Density and Feeding Regime on Performance of Broiler Chicken in Summer Season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant effects of stocking density on feed consumption during the rearing period were in agreement with previous studies (Yakubu et al, 2010;Beg et al, 2011;Rambau et al, 2016;Siaga et al, 2017), namely bodyweight gain during the starter and grower periods, and feed conversion ratio during the finisher period, These studies indicated that high stocking densities reduced feed consumption, bodyweight gain and market weight, and improved feed conversion ratio. However, the extent of reduction or improvement depended on how high the particular density was.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant effects of stocking density on feed consumption during the rearing period were in agreement with previous studies (Yakubu et al, 2010;Beg et al, 2011;Rambau et al, 2016;Siaga et al, 2017), namely bodyweight gain during the starter and grower periods, and feed conversion ratio during the finisher period, These studies indicated that high stocking densities reduced feed consumption, bodyweight gain and market weight, and improved feed conversion ratio. However, the extent of reduction or improvement depended on how high the particular density was.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several studies have been conducted on the effects of stocking density on broiler performance, but the results have been conflicting. Some studies showed no significant influence of stocking density on broiler performance (Buijs et al, 2009;Rambau et al, 2016) while others demonstrated adverse effects of high stocking densities (Beg et al, 2011;Tong et al, 2012;Ligaraba et al, 2016;Siaga et al, 2017). Others, on the other hand, reported improved broiler performance with increased stocking density (Feddes et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cravener et al, (1992) showed that stocking density at 0.05m 2 /bird decreased significantly carcass weight compared to those stocked at 0.07, 0.09 and 0.11m 2 /bird. Beg et al, (2011) manifested that the dressing % was significantly higher when stocked broiler at 8 and 10 birds/m 2 compared with those stocked at 12 or 14 birds/m 2 .…”
Section: Hormonal Assays and Immunological Responsementioning
confidence: 96%
“…De hoeveelheid water verbruikt door kippen wordt beïnvloed door een aantal factoren (Manning et al, 2007a;2007b), die mogelijk cumulatief of multiplicatief kunnen werken; dergelijke combinaties van factoren zijn echter weinig onderzocht (Castro et al, 2009;Beg et al, 2011). Het is gangbare praktijk om het waterverbruik van de vleeskuikens te controleren door een schatting van het aantal liters per 1000 vleeskuikens per dag (DEFRA, 2002;ACP, 2006).…”
Section: Pathologische Afwijkingenunclassified