2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(02)00395-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of steam injection on pore structure and distribution in coke samples produced by delayed coking☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems illogical since in this work the porosity has been considered as the space left by the coke volume fraction; therefore, a higher quantity of coke should generate a lower porosity, which did not happen. However, these results confirm observations made by Karacan & Badger (2003) who affirm that the properties of the coke bed depend on the fluid-dynamic variables of the reaction medium, phenomenon that is reproduced in this work by computational simulation. Figure 19 shows the medium Reynolds number inside the coke bed for the phases vacuum residue, and distillables plotted against the volume-averaged porosity of each coke bed.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It seems illogical since in this work the porosity has been considered as the space left by the coke volume fraction; therefore, a higher quantity of coke should generate a lower porosity, which did not happen. However, these results confirm observations made by Karacan & Badger (2003) who affirm that the properties of the coke bed depend on the fluid-dynamic variables of the reaction medium, phenomenon that is reproduced in this work by computational simulation. Figure 19 shows the medium Reynolds number inside the coke bed for the phases vacuum residue, and distillables plotted against the volume-averaged porosity of each coke bed.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An apparent linear relationship is observed, where the increase in the Reynolds number generates an increase in the coke bed porosity. Karacan & Badger (2003) presented similar results experimentally. In their work, the porosity of a coke bed from a delayed coking pilot plant reactor is measured with and without steam injection; the porosity is, evidently, higher with steam injection (increased Reynolds number).…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address these weaknesses in the bubble observation techniques, researchers need to investigate the noncontact ''tomography'' observation methods, including Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), and X-ray and the gamma-ray computed tomographies, which traditionally have been used as nondestructive evaluation techniques [72,73]. X-raycomputed tomography is a particularly appealing candidate for a real-time measurement of bubbles (or moving ''porosities'') because it has been used successfully to measure porosities in other manufacturing processes [74][75][76].…”
Section: A Need For Accurate Experimental Observation Of Partial Saturation and Bubble Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as aforesaid. It has been shown that total porosity and pore structure are significant factors affecting coke strength (Donskoi et al 2013;Grant and Chaklader 1991;Johnson et al 2013;Karacan and Badger 2003;Xing et al 2013). It was observed that coke strength is mainly determined by pores and cracks that cause fracturing of coke (Kubota et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%