2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.10.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes after coronary revascularization in patients ≥80 years of age: Observations from the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulative incidences of MACE, all-cause and CV death, stroke and coronary revascularization were also significantly lower in statin users vs non users, whereas MI rate did not differ between the statin and no-statin groups [1]. Interestingly, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for all CV outcomes, except for MI, were lower in the superelder group compared with the non-super-elder group (0.77 vs 0.82 for MACE, 0.76 vs 0.77 for all-cause death, 0.74 vs 0.76 for CV death, 0.75 vs 0.81 for stroke and 0.88 vs 0.92 for coronary revascularization, respectively).Gender and baseline LDL-C levels did not affect the results for both patient groups [1]. However, in the super-elder group, patients treated with potent statins and those achieving LDL-C levels <100 mg/dl tended to have lower MACE rates compared with those on a standard statin and those with on-treatment LDL-C levels 100 mg/dl, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Cumulative incidences of MACE, all-cause and CV death, stroke and coronary revascularization were also significantly lower in statin users vs non users, whereas MI rate did not differ between the statin and no-statin groups [1]. Interestingly, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for all CV outcomes, except for MI, were lower in the superelder group compared with the non-super-elder group (0.77 vs 0.82 for MACE, 0.76 vs 0.77 for all-cause death, 0.74 vs 0.76 for CV death, 0.75 vs 0.81 for stroke and 0.88 vs 0.92 for coronary revascularization, respectively).Gender and baseline LDL-C levels did not affect the results for both patient groups [1]. However, in the super-elder group, patients treated with potent statins and those achieving LDL-C levels <100 mg/dl tended to have lower MACE rates compared with those on a standard statin and those with on-treatment LDL-C levels 100 mg/dl, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Gender and baseline LDL-C levels did not affect the results for both patient groups [1]. However, in the super-elder group, patients treated with potent statins and those achieving LDL-C levels <100 mg/dl tended to have lower MACE rates compared with those on a standard statin and those with on-treatment LDL-C levels 100 mg/dl, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations