2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of starvation time on NO and N2O production during heterotrophic denitrification with nitrite and glucose shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those four genera were: Gemmobacter , a poly‐hydroxybutyrate‐accumulating and denitrifying bacteria; 87 Clostridium , a known fermenter and VFA producer; 76 Lachnoclostridium , a known butyrate producer; 88 and Rhodopseudomonas , a highly metabolically versatile bacteria capable of H 2 production through N 2 fixation or poly‐hydroxybutyrate production 89 . The operational conditions applied in the F/M‐0.5 experiment were thus apparently those that favor the best microbial combination to produce the highest level of VFAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those four genera were: Gemmobacter , a poly‐hydroxybutyrate‐accumulating and denitrifying bacteria; 87 Clostridium , a known fermenter and VFA producer; 76 Lachnoclostridium , a known butyrate producer; 88 and Rhodopseudomonas , a highly metabolically versatile bacteria capable of H 2 production through N 2 fixation or poly‐hydroxybutyrate production 89 . The operational conditions applied in the F/M‐0.5 experiment were thus apparently those that favor the best microbial combination to produce the highest level of VFAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower F/M ratios, the community was mainly composed of the same four genera, which altogether represented 84.3%, 77.6%, and 74.7% of the F/M-0.5, F/M-1, and F/M-2 populations, respectively (Figure 3 and 4). Those four genera were Gemmobacter , a poly-hydroxybutyrate-accumulating and denitrifying bactéria (Wang et al, 2019), Clostridium , a known fermenter and VFAs producer (Mockaitis et al, 2022), Lachnoclostridium , a known butyrate producer (Detman et al, 2021), and Rhodopseudomonas , a highly metabolically versatile bacteria capable of hydrogen production through nitrogen fixation or poly-hydroxybutyrate production (Ranaivoarisoa et al, 2019). The operational conditions applied in the F/M-0.5 experiment were thus apparently those that favor the best microbial combination to produce the highest level of VFAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in the IBAS, the average relative abundances of the aerobic denitrifiers Paracoccus, Rhodobacter, , and Hyphomicrobium were largely reduced in C1 compared to C0. The facultative anaerobic denitrifier Thermomonas and anaerobic denitrifier Azospira were the top two genera (8.5 ± 1.1% and 3.5 ± 5.9%, respectively) in C0, but their abundances were reduced to 0.4 ± 0.2% and 0.1 ± 0.2%, respectively, in C1 (Figure ; Table S4). Devosia, Lautropia, and Bdellovibrio were also significantly decreased in C1 compared to C0 ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facultative anaerobic denitrifier Thermomonas and anaerobic denitrifier Azospira were the top two genera (8.5 ± 1.1% and 3.5 ± 5.9%, respectively) in C0, but their abundances were reduced to 0.4 ± 0.2% and 0.1 ± 0.2%, respectively, in C1 (Figure ; Table S4). Devosia, Lautropia, and Bdellovibrio were also significantly decreased in C1 compared to C0 ( p < 0.05). As a result, the relative abundance of all denitrifiers was reduced from 19.4 ± 9.6 to 12.5 ± 2.9% in the IBAS but remained stable in the SRAS fish tank (10.4 ± 2.0% and 10.4 ± 2.4% in T0 and T1, respectively) and even increased from 10.1 ± 4.8% to 12.3 ± 3.0% in the SRAS assimilation reactor (Figure ; Table S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%