2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of starting grain size on the evolution of microstructure and texture during thermo-mechanical processing of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3-8). Recrystallization of the fcc solid solution after annealing in the examined temperature range can be readily anticipated taking into account available information on alloys with similar compositions [20,38,42,[51][52][53]. However, some features of the carbide particles precipitation required additional consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-8). Recrystallization of the fcc solid solution after annealing in the examined temperature range can be readily anticipated taking into account available information on alloys with similar compositions [20,38,42,[51][52][53]. However, some features of the carbide particles precipitation required additional consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been suggested that the recrystallisation resistance observed in some HEAs provides evidence for their sluggish diffusion kinetics. 52,53,55,65,212,214 It is true that slow atomic diffusion does inhibit recrystallisation, but rates will also depend on other variables such as dislocation concentrations and distributions, prior grain size, and the presence of second phases or other inhomogeneities. 216 Hence, careful investigation is needed before recrystallisation kinetics are related to diffusion kinetics.…”
Section: Sluggish Diffusion Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the opinion of these authors, the distorted lattice of HEAs hindered atomic movement, resulting in sluggish transport properties and formation of precipitates of nanometric size due to reduced rates of nucleation and growth. This view was later adopted by several authors to explain their own results, as well as to explain other phenomena, such as, e.g., slow kinetic of oxidation or high creep resistance [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, despite the frequent usage of the sluggish diffusion argument, the first direct diffusion studies, performed using the diffusion couple approach, were published by Tsai et al in 2013 [28], nine years after the first reports concerning the sluggish diffusion phenomenon.…”
Section: Studies Of Sluggish Diffusion Studies In High Entropy Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%