2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on pregnancy outcome depends on oocyte quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
106
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the selection of spermatozoa with MSOME improves results in ICSI cycles suggests that the technique deselects a physiological abnormality in spermatozoa. One physiological abnormality shown to have a correlation with pregnancy outcome after ICSI is the level of DNA fragmentation [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the selection of spermatozoa with MSOME improves results in ICSI cycles suggests that the technique deselects a physiological abnormality in spermatozoa. One physiological abnormality shown to have a correlation with pregnancy outcome after ICSI is the level of DNA fragmentation [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of human oocyte to repair sperm DNA damage, has not been fully elucidated, but some studies showed that the oocyte is equipped with mechanisms that can repair some of the paternal DNA abnormalities [25,31,47]. However, the ability to repair the oocyte depends on the quality and genetics of the oocyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] To date, no consensus has been achieved regarding the effect of these techniques on the DNA integrity of sperm. Several investigations have shown that sperm preparation techniques considerably reduce the level of DNA damage present in a semen sample, [4][5][6][7] while other studies have reported that these methods do not recover spermatozoa with lower incidence of DNA damage. 8 Some groups have reported that the DGC technique appreciably reduces the percentage of sperm with DNA damage, whereas the SUP method shows no significant improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%