2002
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Speech Task on Intelligibility in Dysarthria: A Case Study of Parkinson's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
91
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
91
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Spontaneous elicitation requires initiation and full planning of a motor speech gesture, whereas the task of utterance completion provides a model of the expected response. Previous work has indicated an effect of task, whether spontaneous or performed following an external model, on motor and speech gestures (Kempler & Van Lancker, 2002;Sidtis, Rogers, Godier, Tagliati, & Sidtis, 2010). In contexts where participants must initiate, program, and plan a gesture-whether of gait, arm, or speech-performance is measurably worse than in contexts where a model, exemplar, guideline, or aid to the gesture is provided (e.g., Burleigh et al, 1997;Georgiou et al, 1993;Weiss et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous elicitation requires initiation and full planning of a motor speech gesture, whereas the task of utterance completion provides a model of the expected response. Previous work has indicated an effect of task, whether spontaneous or performed following an external model, on motor and speech gestures (Kempler & Van Lancker, 2002;Sidtis, Rogers, Godier, Tagliati, & Sidtis, 2010). In contexts where participants must initiate, program, and plan a gesture-whether of gait, arm, or speech-performance is measurably worse than in contexts where a model, exemplar, guideline, or aid to the gesture is provided (e.g., Burleigh et al, 1997;Georgiou et al, 1993;Weiss et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(8), 1760-1763 1761 and normal's. Results show that the normal's were having the highest mean intelligibility in normal's which is then followed by the ALS group then by PD group for the sentence intelligibility task (Weismer, Jeng, Laures, Kent & Kent, 2001) .According to Kempler & Lancker, 2002, speech production efficacy varies with tasks. Hustad, 2007 measured speech intelligibility using transcription and rating scale in different types and severity of dysarthria across three different types of speech stimuli.…”
Section: Introduction:-mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Estas alterações condicionam a inteligibilidade do discurso e as competências comunicativas (Kempler & Van Lancker, 2002;Tjaden & Wilding, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A leitura-em-voz-alta é representativa da produção de discurso espontâneo, e deve ser avaliada utilizando um texto foneticamente equilibrado (TFE) construído especificamente para a língua padrão da população a que se destina (Kempler & Van Lancker, 2002;Lowit-Leuschel & Docherty, 2001). A aplicação um TFE em sujeitos com alterações motoras da fala permite recolher dados acerca das PMF e estudar o impacto destas patologias nas competências comunicativas (Baken & Orlikoff, 2000;Lowit-Leuschel & Docherty, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation