1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00202083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of specimen structural orientation on the moisture content ? water potential relationship of wood

Abstract: Summary The boundary desorption curve of the moisture content -water potential relationship of aspen sapwood was determined at 20 ~ by the tension plate and pressure membrane methods for three specimen structural orientations and four imposed water potential values. The results show that the relationship is independent of the wood structural direction considered. Also, they further demonstrate that the discrepancies observed in a previous study between the moisture content -water potential relationships obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the absorption moisture contents measured in the present study is in the same range as the absorption data presented by Penner [16] and Fortin [17] for spruce and western hemlock respectively. The desorption data from the present study, to which the absorption measurements were compared, are in the same range as desorption results from previous studies performed on softwoods around 20ºC [16,17,20] as well as data for aspen sapwood [18,19] . However, there are two exceptions: Thygesen and Engelund [26] and Stone and Scallan [35] , in both these studies the desorption moisture contents are significantly lower.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, the absorption moisture contents measured in the present study is in the same range as the absorption data presented by Penner [16] and Fortin [17] for spruce and western hemlock respectively. The desorption data from the present study, to which the absorption measurements were compared, are in the same range as desorption results from previous studies performed on softwoods around 20ºC [16,17,20] as well as data for aspen sapwood [18,19] . However, there are two exceptions: Thygesen and Engelund [26] and Stone and Scallan [35] , in both these studies the desorption moisture contents are significantly lower.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The outflow of water from the extractors was checked 2-5 times a week, and the time to equilibrium was in each case 2-3 months. Only cylindrical samples were used for the PPT experiments, and they were always placed with one of the two flat faces facing the disk, i.e., water was made to move along the grain, which should ensure the shortest possible time to equilibrium (Cloutier et al 1995).…”
Section: Relative Humidity Levels and Equilibrium Moisture Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a uniform distribution of both RH and moisture content within the specimens provided that the equilibration time is long enough. Although there are observations of moisture content gradients in specimens conditioned with pressure plate/pressure membrane measurements, they were attributed to lack of equilibrium (Cloutier and Fortin 1991;Cloutier et al 1995), i.e. too short equilibration times.…”
Section: Potential Differences In Moisture States Between the Conditioning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%