2000
DOI: 10.1007/s006030070006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Specimen Geometry and Testing Method on Mixed Mode I-II Fracture Toughness of a Limestone Rock from Saudi Arabia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, differences may exist in the development of the process zone, as it is affected by the type of loading, e.g., bending versus tension. Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) found that the fracture toughness values of limestone measured using CSTBD and CCNBD specimens were, respectively, 0.42 and 0.61 MPam 0.5 . Chang et al (2002) reported that the fracture toughness values measured using chevronnotched SCB specimens for granite and marble were 1.39 and 1.11 MPam 0.5 , respectively.…”
Section: Mode I Fracture Toughness Measured By Scb and Cb Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, differences may exist in the development of the process zone, as it is affected by the type of loading, e.g., bending versus tension. Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) found that the fracture toughness values of limestone measured using CSTBD and CCNBD specimens were, respectively, 0.42 and 0.61 MPam 0.5 . Chang et al (2002) reported that the fracture toughness values measured using chevronnotched SCB specimens for granite and marble were 1.39 and 1.11 MPam 0.5 , respectively.…”
Section: Mode I Fracture Toughness Measured By Scb and Cb Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These values are lower than the fracture toughness values measured using other specimens. Khan and Al-Shayea (2000) measured the fracture toughness of limestone using SCB, CSTBD, CCNBD, and SECRBB specimens; the average values measured using the SCB, CSTBD, CCNBD, and SECRBB specimens were 0.68, 0.42, 0.61, and 0.55 MPam 0.5 , respectively. Tutluoglu and Keles (2011) found that the fracture toughness values of andesite measured using CCNBD, SCB, and SNDB specimens were 1.45 ± 0.06 MPam 0.5 with five specimens, 0.94 ± 0.12 MPam 0.5 with 21 specimens, and 1.00 ± 0.09 MPam 0.5 with 20 specimens, respectively.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, numerous existing studies have shown that there is a strong relation between fracture toughness and tensile strength of rocks (Haberfield and Johnston 1989;Khan and Al-Shayea 2000;Whittaker et al 1992;Zhang et al 1998;Zhang 2002) and the later can be easily incorporated into the FIP solution (Eq. 41) in this paper by simply adding a tensile strength term to the numerator of Eq.…”
Section: Comparison With Fracture-bridging Wellbore Strengthening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research works have been carried out using different test specimens and different techniques. The most popular brittle materials of interest for mixed mode fracture were mainly rocks [9], [10], [12], [14], [15], ceramics [5], [8], [20], [21], Glasses like plexiglass (PMMA) [2], [3], [7], [11], [15], [16], soda lime silica glass [4], [6], [7], [13], [17], [18], [19] and some polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indentation technique used are Knoop indentation tests [4], [6] and Vickers indentation tests [8], [13]. The popular test methods used for experiments include cracked Brazilian disc [10], [11], [12], [14], [19], [21] under diametrical compression and semicircular bend specimen [9], [12], [15], [16], [20] with thru crack under three point bending. From the literature it can be concluded that the simplicity of loading fixture, manufacturing ease and specimen pre-cracking were prime reasons for selecting specimens and testing procedure for particular mixed mode testing in brittle material [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%