2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0965545x08070109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of spatial constraints on phase separation during polymerization in sequential semi-interpenetrating polymer networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a model incorporating the role of damage accumulation to the mechanical polybutylmethacrylate and polyurethane, along with data for the corresponding neat components. 18 The behavior is consistent with a homogeneous phase morphology.…”
Section: A Interpenetrating Polymer Networksupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a model incorporating the role of damage accumulation to the mechanical polybutylmethacrylate and polyurethane, along with data for the corresponding neat components. 18 The behavior is consistent with a homogeneous phase morphology.…”
Section: A Interpenetrating Polymer Networksupporting
confidence: 65%
“…15,16 The glass transition temperature, T g , of an IPN is intermediate to those of the pure components, as shown in Figure 2 for an IPN 17 and Figure 3 for a semi-IPN. 18 The phase morphologies are not homogeneous, but the domains are small, so that properties such as the segmental dynamics tend to be averages. Because T g is size dependent for domain sizes on the order or smaller than the cooperativity length scale, changes in the glass transition temperatures of the components do not necessarily indicate mixing on the segmental level.…”
Section: A Interpenetrating Polymer Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Semi-IPN" is used in reference to an IPN in which one component remains uncrosslinked [94,95]. The T g of an IPN is expected to be intermediate to the neat component T g 's, as shown in Figure 14 for an IPN [96] and Figure 15 for a semi-IPN [97]. Even though the constituents are incompatible, small phase domains are obtained, homogenizing the properties.…”
Section: Interpenetrating Polymer Network An Interpenetrating Polymmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss tangent for linear polybutylmethacrylate, polyurethane network, and their semi-IPN. Data from ref [97]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babkina et al [22] suggested that the sequential reaction of the IPN systems form considerable amounts of topological engagements between the two polymer chains, facilitating the compatibility of the components. In addition, the continuity of the PU phase plays a significant role in the development of the PMMA phase of the IPN as well as the resulting phase separation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%