1986
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/20.2.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sotalol on human atrial action potential duration and refractoriness: cycle length dependency of class III activity

Abstract: Using intracardiac electrophysiological techniques the effects of sotalol hydrochloride were studied in the right atrium in eight patients with paroxysmal supraventricular atrial arrhythmias. Atrial action potential duration was recorded from two well separated standard sites via endocardial contact electrodes before and for 30 minutes after intravenous sotalol (1 mg X kg-1). Atrial effective refractory period and vulnerability to atrial arrhythmia initiation were assessed by premature extrastimulation. All pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases of 8.7% and 10% in APD90 were seen with DL-sotalol 10;JM and D-sotalol 10IM, respectively. These are consistent with increases in atrial monophasic action potential duration of 16% seen by Echt et al (1982) and 6-8% found by Hayward & Taggart (1986) following acute administration of DL-sotalol intravenously. Blood levels were presented only for the first of these studies where peak plasma sotalol levels were approximately 5-991M.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increases of 8.7% and 10% in APD90 were seen with DL-sotalol 10;JM and D-sotalol 10IM, respectively. These are consistent with increases in atrial monophasic action potential duration of 16% seen by Echt et al (1982) and 6-8% found by Hayward & Taggart (1986) following acute administration of DL-sotalol intravenously. Blood levels were presented only for the first of these studies where peak plasma sotalol levels were approximately 5-991M.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Levels up to approximately 40 JAM have been found in patients immediately following acute intravenous injection of DL-sotalol (Nademanee et al, 1985) but it is unlikely that the concentrations would remain so high for long (Campbell et al, 1985). Indeed, severe toxicity has been described at blood levels of 25 gM and 53 JM following deliberate overdosage (Elonen et al, 1979 Effects on human atrial cells DL-Sotalol has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in man at concentrations below 10 JAM (Campbell et al, 1985) and to prolong human atrial repolarization in similar concentrations (measured as monophasic action potential duration; Echt et al, 1982;Hayward & Taggart, 1986). These facts strongly suggest the possibility that human atrial cells may be more sensitive than those of rabbits or guinea-pigs to the class III actions of solatol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atrial APD was longer in LQTS patients than in the control group and longer than in published control groups 17–19 . Comparable action potential prolongation is caused by potassium channel (sotalol) or sodium channel (ibutilide) blocking drugs in the human atrium 6 , 20 . Repolarizing currents that determine atrial repolarization include the transient outward current I to , calcium currents, the late inward sodium current I Na , and the two components of the delayed rectifier (I Kr and I Ks ) 5,6 , 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hierzu gehört die Verlängerung der effektiven und absoluten Refraktärzeit sowohl im Vorhof-und Ventrikelmyokard als auch im Erregungsleitungssystem (7,39). Die Wirksamkeit in der Unterdrückung von Vorhofflimmern wird dabei vor allem der Wirkung am Vorhofmyokard zugeschrieben (18). Es konnte in randomisierten, doppelblinden und placebokontrollierten Studien die Wirksamkeit von Sotalol als Anfallsprophylaxe bei häufigem paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern (> 1× im Monat auftretend) nachgewiesen werden, wobei die Gabe von 2× 160 mg/Tag der Dosis 2× 80 mg/Tag deutlich überlegen war (8,42).…”
Section: Patientenkollektiv/statistikunclassified