2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of somatic cell count on milk and protein yields and female fertility in Tunisian Holstein dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies regarding the detrimental impact of the health status and increased production levels on fertility. Rekik et al (2008) documented that both intervals DFI and FIC increased by 1.3 to 2 days for each unit increase in somatic cell score in Tunisian Holsteins. Melendez and Pinedo (2007) reported that for each 100 kg increase in a 305-day milk yield, the DO increased by 0.6 and the conception rate at first insemination decreased by 0.9 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several studies regarding the detrimental impact of the health status and increased production levels on fertility. Rekik et al (2008) documented that both intervals DFI and FIC increased by 1.3 to 2 days for each unit increase in somatic cell score in Tunisian Holsteins. Melendez and Pinedo (2007) reported that for each 100 kg increase in a 305-day milk yield, the DO increased by 0.6 and the conception rate at first insemination decreased by 0.9 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Tunisia, milk yield has traditionally been the most important breeding objective, with little or no focus on functional traits (Rekik and Ben Gara, 2004). Plans for the improvement of the national milk production have been developed in Tunisia since 1960 through the use of semen from highmerit sires and the importation of pregnant heifers from the United States and European countries such as Germany and the Netherlands (Djemali and Berger, 1992;Rekik and Ben Gara, 2004;Rekik et al, 2008). Reproductive data were included in the recording scheme in the late 1990s .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCC also has an economic value in their own right in industries where there are milk price penalties for milk supplied for processing with very high counts. High SCC is not only associated with udder health and milk losses, but also negatively affects the longevity [9] and fertility [10] of dairy cows. Thus, incorporation of SCC in selection decisions seems desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across studies primiparous cows with 200 000 SCC showed, in kilograms per day, a milk loss of 0.13 (Boland et al, 2013), 0.23 to 1.76 (Rekik et al, 2008), 0.28 (Halasa et al, 2009), 0.61 (Hortet et al, 1999), 0.46 to 0.72 (Dürr et al, 2008), 0.35 to 0.80 (Hand et al, 2012). The results of the present study for thresholds of 200 000 and 400 000 SCC predicted higher milk yield losses in the range of 0.8 to 1.4 and 1.0 to 2.7 kg day −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dürr et al (2008) set the limit for subclinical mastitis at more than 7400 SCC, Hand et al (2012) at 200 000, and in our study more than 100 000 SCC with additional specific limitations. Various lower limits of SCC over a broad range have been proposed in previous studies: 51 000 to more than 1 000 000 in PAR of one to four (Boland et al, 2013), 31 000 to more than 400 000 (Green et al, 2006), less than 200 000 (Rekik et al, 2008), 100 000 to 600 000 (Hortet et al, 1999), and 500 000 for primiparous and multiparous cows (Hagnestam-Nielsen et al, 2009). In some higher classes, the ranges were from less than 200 000 to 1 000 000 SCC with milk yield loss of 0.387 to 2.351 kg day −1 (Guo et al, 2010), 403 000 to 1 900 000 SCC with 0.6 to 3.8 kg estimated milk yield loss (Yalçin et al, 2000), and 200 000 to 2 000 000 SCC with a reduction of milk production of 0.35-1.09 kg day −1 to 1.49-4.70 kg day −1 (Hand et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%