The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(96)00390-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of solar radiation on the formation of dissolved gaseous mercury in temperate lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

23
178
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
23
178
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Photoreduction of Hg 2+ , caused by solar radiation, has been identified as the primary mechanism in the production of DGM in lake waters (Amyot et al 1994;O'Driscoll et al 2003a). Other studies have reported elevated DGM during summer in northern lakes (31-80 pg L 21 , Amyot et al 1997; 76 pg L 21 , O 'Driscoll et al 2003a). Modest differences were observed in average specific conductivity (Sp.…”
Section: Hg Relationship With Doc Somentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Photoreduction of Hg 2+ , caused by solar radiation, has been identified as the primary mechanism in the production of DGM in lake waters (Amyot et al 1994;O'Driscoll et al 2003a). Other studies have reported elevated DGM during summer in northern lakes (31-80 pg L 21 , Amyot et al 1997; 76 pg L 21 , O 'Driscoll et al 2003a). Modest differences were observed in average specific conductivity (Sp.…”
Section: Hg Relationship With Doc Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in time lag and rates of DGM production between different lakes may be controlled primarily by DOC content and structure. Amyot et al (1997) compared lakes with low and high DOC, and found DGM production was several-fold greater in low DOC lakes. In another study, for a similar range in DOC concentration DGM production was lower in lakes with clear-cut watershed compared to reference lakes, and DOC structure was found to be an important factor controlling this response (O 'Driscoll et al 2004).…”
Section: Hg Relationship With Doc Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known to form exceptionally strong complexes with the oxidized mercuric species, Hg(II), due to its coordination with reduced sulfur (−S) or thiol (−SH) functional groups in DOM at relatively high DOM:Hg(II) ratios (11,(18)(19)(20)(21). Such complexation has been shown to limit Hg(II) availability for bacterial methylation (9, 22, 23); however, facilitated uptake and methylation are also reported, especially when Hg(II) is complexed with small molecular-weight thiol compounds such as cysteine (5,24).Although a large body of literature is now available on the interactions of oxidized Hg(II) species with DOM, reactions between reduced gaseous Hg(0) and DOM have rarely been examined in natural sediments and water where dissolved Hg(0) is also observed (16,17,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Hg(0) has a solubility of ∼56 μg/L in water (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 10-30 % of the Hg exists as elemental Hg in ocean water , where Hg 0 is mainly formed from the reduction of Hg (II) by aquatic microorganisms (Mason et al 1995) and from photoreduction of Hg (II) (Amyot et al 1997;Costa and Liss 2000) followed by geotectonic activity (Ferrara et al 2003;Horvat et al 2003). Abiotic methylation may take place in an environment loaded with humic organic matter (Weber 1993).…”
Section: Mercurymentioning
confidence: 99%