2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Soil Water on Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity and Texture Relationships in a Dryland Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relationships between averaged ECa and SWC values followed the exponential model; this type of relationship was observed in earlier works (Celano et al, 2011;McCutcheon et al, 2006;Mishra et al, 2014). This exponential relationship held at SWCs below 0.11 kg kg -1 , but was not applicable at higher water contents, possibly because of the presence of complex vertical distributions of soil water content in the wet soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Relationships between averaged ECa and SWC values followed the exponential model; this type of relationship was observed in earlier works (Celano et al, 2011;McCutcheon et al, 2006;Mishra et al, 2014). This exponential relationship held at SWCs below 0.11 kg kg -1 , but was not applicable at higher water contents, possibly because of the presence of complex vertical distributions of soil water content in the wet soil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In particular, the transient nature of soil water content and soil temperature was found to complicate the characterization of ECa variability by altering its response to a given soil property during a given mapping event (McCutcheon et al, 2006), such that the spatial and temporal variance of θ explained by EMI-ECa data is strongly unstable (Calamita et al, 2015). Repeated EMI measure-ments at one site (which require accounting for temperature changes between different dates) allow for inference of the dynamic component of the signal, based on the assumption that changes of ECa are related to changes in the volume of water in the soil pores and/or changes in the concentration of ions in the soil solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of non-invasive geophysical techniques for soil mapping is very attractive, the dependence of the measured ECa on a number of parameters complicates any interpretation to determine soil properties or states (Robinson et al, 2012). A firm understanding of the spatial and temporal variability of soil electrical conductivity (EC) and an appreciation for its highly complex interactions with static soil properties and dynamic state variables, particularly at low-salt concentrations, is needed (Sudduth et al, 2001(Sudduth et al, , 2005McCutcheon et al, 2006), and it is helpful for understanding when EMI 496 E. Martini et al: Repeated electromagnetic induction measurements for mapping soil moisture can be applied, as it is not applicable under all circumstances (Robinson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The σ properties of the soil are also influenced by organic matter content, water content, and clay content [11,12]. The more organic contents in the peat, the higher the σ [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%