Effect of Soil Tillage and Crop Sequence on Grain Yield and Quality of Durum Wheat in Mediterranean Areas

Pagnani, Giancarlo; Galieni, Angelica; D’Egidio, Sara; Visioli, Giovanna; Stagnari, Fabio; Pisante, Michele

doi:10.3390/agronomy9090488

Cited by 36 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 61 publications

(69 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hountongninou (2016) reported that tillage does not significantly affect maize grain yield and justified this by the sandy-clayey texture of its study site, which provides a similar environment under plowing. Although NT is recognized as one of the Conservation Agriculture practices (Lal, 2004;Reicosky and Saxton, 2007;Martínez et al, 2008;Tabaglio et al, 2009;Kolb et al, 2012;Soane et al, 2012;Fiorini et al, 2018), its adoption requires a transition phase (on average 7-8 years), characterized by higher annual weed and disease pressures, slow rebuilding aggregates in soil, and lower and variable yields (Knowler and Bradshaw, 2007;Pagnani et al, 2019). However, as outlined in Sharma and Abrol (2005), soil types react differently to the same tillage method.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of soil conservation practices on soil moisture and maize crop (Zea mays L.) productivity in Centre Benin

Akplo¹,

Alladassi²,

Martinien³

et al. 2020

Afr. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soil quality constitutes a major factor for crops growth. This study aimed at determining the sustainable soil conservation practices that would increase maize growth as well as production and improve the soil moisture. Two experimental sites were chosen: Dan localized on Acrisol and Zazounmè localized on ferralsol. Two cropping seasons were investigated: the long rain seasons of 2018 and 2019. The experimental design was split-plot with four replications. The main factor was tillage with three modalities: no-tillage (NT); ridging parallel to the slope (PR); Isohypse ridging (IR) and the second factor was mulching with four amounts: 0, 3, 5 and 7 t.ha -1 . Tillage, mulch amount and their interaction significantly influenced the soil moisture, maize growth and yield over the two investigated cropping seasons at both sites whereby the highest values were obtained under IR for tillage, 7 t.ha -1 (for mulch amount) and IR7M (for the interaction tillage x mulch amount). Overall, IR significantly increased the maize growth speed by 8% at Dan and by 16% at Za-zounmè; the maize grain yield by 33% at Dan and by 30% at Za-zounmè and the soil water content by 24% at Dan and 20% at Za-zounmè, in comparison with No-Tillage. An increasing effect of mulch amount was also observed. As far as mulching is concerned, the highest values (in average of LR2018 and LR2019) of growth speed (3.77 cm.day -1 at Dan and 4.08 cm.day -1 at Za-zounmè); grain yield (3003.03 at Dan and 3471.09 kg.ha -1 at Za-zounmè) and soil water content (26.89 mm at Dan and 20.44 mm at Za-zounmè) were observed. This suggests that isohypse ridging associated with an appropriate amount of organic mulch could be an option to mitigate dry spells and drought and improve local farmers' income in the area of low rainfall in sub-Sahara Africa.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of soil conservation practices on soil moisture and maize crop (Zea mays L.) productivity in Centre Benin

Akplo¹,

Alladassi²,

Martinien³

et al. 2020

Afr. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of this study revealed that tillage did not substantially affect GPC in either year, except GPC under NT was significantly higher than under RR in 2017. According to the findings of Pagnani et al [51], tillage significantly influenced N accumulation and remobilization, while greater N remobilization from vegetative organs to grains was the critical factor that achieved a higher GPC. Therefore, it is inferred that the interaction of tillage and soil moisture affects N absorption and remobilization, which collectively restrict grain yield and protein formation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Nitrogen Management Strategies of Tillage and No-Tillage Wheat Following Rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China: Grain Yield, Grain Protein, Nitrogen Efficiency, and Economics

Ding

et al. 2020

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the rice-wheat rotation system, conventional culturing of high yield rice results in poor soil conditions and excessive residues, which negatively affect wheat growth. Tillage and nitrogen (N) use are being sought to address this problem. In order to propose a suitable tillage method and corresponding N management strategy, the influence of three tillage methods (i.e., plow tillage followed by rotary tillage (PR), rotary tillage twice (RR), and no-tillage (NT)) and nine forms of N management strategies (i.e., three total N rates × three N-splitting schemes) were investigated in a field experiment from 2016 to 2017 (2017) and 2017 to 2018 (2018), using grain yield, grain protein content (GPC), N uptake efficiency (NUpE), and net returns as evaluation indexes. Grain yield, GPC, and net returns were lower in 2017 than 2018, likely as a result of weak seedling growth caused by high soil moisture before and after seeding. In 2017, NT achieved higher grain yield, NUpE, and net returns compared to PR or RR, while grain yield and net returns were higher under tillage in 2018, especially PR. Increased total N rates (210–270 kg ha−1) promoted all evaluation indexes, but suitable timing and corresponding rates of N application are dependent on the environment. These results indicate that the combination of NT and applying N at lower rates and only a few times (i.e., 168 and 72 kg ha−1 applied at pre-sowing and when flag leaves are visible) when the soil is not suitable for tillage is the best method for cutting costs and improving benefits. Under suitable conditions for tillage, PR and intensive management strategies (i.e., 135, 27, 54, and 54 kg ha−1 applied at pre-sowing, four-leaf, jointing, and booting, respectively) could be adopted to increase overall yield, quality, and benefits.

show abstract

“…Although tillage has been shown to greatly affect N absorption and remobilization 32 , the difference in N efficiency among the tillage methods can depend on soil environmental conditions. Rial-Lovera et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has previously been reported that water-saturated soil reduces tiller number per seedling an d inhibits root and shoot growth, affecting nutrient absorption and photosynthesis [28][29][30][31] . www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Although tillage has been shown to greatly affect N absorption and remobilization 32 , the difference in N efficiency among the tillage methods can depend on soil environmental conditions. Rial-Lovera et al 33 reported that tillage influenced N use efficiency in a humid growing season.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tillage and seeding strategies for wheat optimizing production in harvested rice fields with high soil moisture

Ding

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Suitable tillage and seeding strategies for wheat can be used to combat excessive residues and poor soil conditions in harvested rice fields. This study investigated the effects of different tillage (zero tillage and rotary tillage) and seeding methods on wheat growth, grain yield, nitrogen (N) uptake and utilization, and economic benefit when the soil moisture was high during the tillage and seeding practices. In 2016–2017, three seeders were tested: SM1-1, SM2, and SM3; in 2017–2018, four seeders were tested: SM1-2, SM2, SM3, and SM4. Although the soil moisture was different between years, zero tillage could be used to reduce the sowing depth, which facilitated early-phase wheat growth and N uptake compared with rotary tillage, resulting in higher grain yield, NUpE, and net return. In 2016–2017 (high wet soil), a small-size seeder (SM1-1) with sowing near the soil surface facilitated higher grain yield, NUpE, and net returns compared with the other seeders; in 2017–2018 (low wet soil), medium-size seeders (SM3 and SM4) were more suitable than small-size seeders (SM1-2 and SM2). In both years, the seeders that performed the best mainly improved the spike numbers while increasing N uptake, especially after anthesis. Zero tillage lowered input costs, but small-size seeders did not reduce costs due to the higher labor costs associated with their low working efficiency. Improving net returns depends largely on increasing yield. In conclusion, zero tillage is recommended for wheat production in harvested rice fields with a high soil moisture content, but the suitable seeding method needs to be confirmed according to the soil moisture content.

show abstract

Effect of Soil Tillage and Crop Sequence on Grain Yield and Quality of Durum Wheat in Mediterranean Areas

Cited by 36 publications

References 61 publications

Influence of soil conservation practices on soil moisture and maize crop (Zea mays L.) productivity in Centre Benin

Influence of soil conservation practices on soil moisture and maize crop (Zea mays L.) productivity in Centre Benin

Nitrogen Management Strategies of Tillage and No-Tillage Wheat Following Rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China: Grain Yield, Grain Protein, Nitrogen Efficiency, and Economics

Tillage and seeding strategies for wheat optimizing production in harvested rice fields with high soil moisture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About