2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Soft Braces on Pain and Physical Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, only three of the thirty studies included in the study of Moyer et al [18] are in long-term follow-up. The meta-analysis by Cudejko et al [39] also focused on short-term indicators only. Our study includes only ten studies with 739 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, only three of the thirty studies included in the study of Moyer et al [18] are in long-term follow-up. The meta-analysis by Cudejko et al [39] also focused on short-term indicators only. Our study includes only ten studies with 739 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical e cacy of valgus knee bracing in the treatment of KOA is not clear. Surprisingly, different studies show opposite outcomes which seriously troubles the selections of physicians in clinic [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Therefore, a meta-analysis is urgent to be performed in order to clarify the e cacy of valgus knee bracing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The valgus knee braces can theoretically change the direction of the force of the knee joint space, further improve symptoms and functions, and delay the progress of KOA accordingly. However, the clinical e cacy of valgus knee braces in the treatment of KOA is not clear, and even different studies have concluded the opposite [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Therefore, to clarify its e cacy, this study included 10 studies for meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%