2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sodium silicate on the magnetic separation of ilmenite from titanaugite by magnetite selective coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Fig. 16, the potential zero charge (PZC) of magnetite and hematite in aqueous solution was found to about pH 5.5 and 5.0, respectively, which were in agreement with previous studies (Nan et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). In deionized water, the zeta potential of magnetite and hematite was decreasing with the increasing of pulp pH that can be attributed to the adsorption of OHions on magnetite and hematite surface.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to Fig. 16, the potential zero charge (PZC) of magnetite and hematite in aqueous solution was found to about pH 5.5 and 5.0, respectively, which were in agreement with previous studies (Nan et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). In deionized water, the zeta potential of magnetite and hematite was decreasing with the increasing of pulp pH that can be attributed to the adsorption of OHions on magnetite and hematite surface.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The combination of a silicate network and magnetic particles in the production of magnetic nanomaterials results in an increased surface area and enhances the porosity of the material, thus remarkably improving their performance (Kooti and Nasiri 2015;Perween and Ranjan 2017). When an external magnetic field is applied to a magnetic nanocomposite, the magnetic particles change their shape magnetostrictively to induce strain on the piezoelectric component, causing dielectric polarization (Zhao et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between microfine coal particles was analyzed on the basis of EDLVO theory. Therefore, the total interaction energy ( V T ) was demonstrated by the following equation V normalT = V normalW + V normalE + V normalH + V normalS where the van der Waals force action energy ( V w , J) was determined by the Hamaker constant and radius of particles, as performed in eq ; the electrostatic repulsion energy ( V E , J) could be calculated in eqs 5–7, which was mainly determined by the charge potential and radius of the particles; the hydrophobic interaction energy ( V H , J) was determined by the acid–base free energy and radius of particles, and it was performed using eqs 8–12; and the steric hindrance energy ( V S , J), which could be obtained from eqs 13 and , was usually influenced by thickness of the adsorption layer and dispersant property V normalW = prefix− false( A 11 A 22 false) 2 R 12 H where A 11 and A 22 are the Hamaker constants of coal particles and water in a vacuum, which equaled to 6.1 × 10 –20 and 3.7 × 10 –20 J, respectively; , R is expressed as the median size of microfine coal particles in the slurry, m ; and H is denoted as the distance between coal particles, nm. V normalE = π ε ε 0 R φ 2 ( ln true[ 1 + exp nobreak0em.25em⁡ false( <...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%