2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.28141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, empagliflozin, and α‐glucosidase inhibitor, voglibose, on hepatic steatosis in an animal model of type 2 diabetes

Abstract: Objective We investigated the effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, empagliflozin, and α‐glucosidase inhibitor, voglibose, on hepatic steatosis in an animal model of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods Empagliflozin (OLETF‐EMPA) or voglibose (OLETF‐VOG) was administered to Otsuka Long‐Evans Tokushima fatty (OLETF) rats once daily for 12 weeks. Control Long‐Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) and OLETF (OLETF‐C) rats received saline. Results Blood glucose levels were significantly suppressed in OLETF‐EMPA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(126 reference statements)
5
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because SIRT1 is an energy-sensing molecule responsible for the promotion of healthy longevity mediated by caloric restriction[ 14 ], it is possible that temporary calorie loss due to the urinary glucose excretion caused by ipragliflozin may stimulate hepatic SIRT1. Similar conclusions were reached by Kim et al[ 31 ]. In addition, AMPK enhances SIRT1 activity by increasing cellular NAD+ levels[ 32 ], and the interplay between SIRT1 and AMPK is suggested to be reciprocal[ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because SIRT1 is an energy-sensing molecule responsible for the promotion of healthy longevity mediated by caloric restriction[ 14 ], it is possible that temporary calorie loss due to the urinary glucose excretion caused by ipragliflozin may stimulate hepatic SIRT1. Similar conclusions were reached by Kim et al[ 31 ]. In addition, AMPK enhances SIRT1 activity by increasing cellular NAD+ levels[ 32 ], and the interplay between SIRT1 and AMPK is suggested to be reciprocal[ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Experimental studies indicates that SGLT2 inhibitors can activate AMPK, SIRT1 and HIF‐1α in the myocardium, thereby potentially contributing to their actions to reduce heart failure and adverse renal events ( Figure ). Canagliflozin increases the expression, phosphorylation and activation of AMPK; although similar effects have been reported for empagliflozin and dapagliflozin, the evidence is less certain . Both canagliflozin and empagliflozin have been shown to upregulate SIRT1, and both empagliflozin and dapagliflozin induce the expression of HIF‐1α .…”
Section: Novel Mechanisms By Which Sglt2 Inhibitors May Promote Cardimentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The major distinction between metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors may be the effect of the latter to stimulate hypoxia‐inducible factors (thus explaining the erythrocytosis seen with these drugs, but not with metformin). This difference may possibly be explained by postulating that metformin exerts its effects primarily through the activation of AMPK and that SGLT2 inhibitors act principally through enhanced SIRT1 signalling . Further studies are needed to confirm, modify or refute this hypothesis.…”
Section: Are Sglt2 Inhibitors Renoprotective Through An Action To Stimentioning
confidence: 99%