2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of social support on changes in quality of life in early breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study

Abstract: Received social support decreased in both groups within 6 months. Significant effects of social support on negative changes on QOL were found. Social support tailored to women's individual needs is an essential part of the care in patients with breast cancer. For further research, longitudinal designs for longer period should be established to explore social support and its effects on QOL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
49
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a greatly stressful event such as cancer, perceived social support can improve QOL. On the contrary, in the study conducted by Salonen et al [18], it was found, that receiving more support from network increased the risk of negative changes in global QoL. As authors suggested it is possible that women, especially in early stages of the disease, do not need or expect to receive social support from their network.…”
Section: Int Conf Society Health Welfare 2014contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…In a greatly stressful event such as cancer, perceived social support can improve QOL. On the contrary, in the study conducted by Salonen et al [18], it was found, that receiving more support from network increased the risk of negative changes in global QoL. As authors suggested it is possible that women, especially in early stages of the disease, do not need or expect to receive social support from their network.…”
Section: Int Conf Society Health Welfare 2014contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Likewise, they constitute one of the principal sources of emotional support, given that by living together they share the effects of the treatments, which is confirmed by Salonen et al, 16 who found up to 77% support from their partners in Finnish women with breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…On the other hand, investment on the relationship grows, increasing its importance in the partner's life and the feeling that their personal interest is tied to the wellbeing of the relationship or, on the contrary, ʻthe partner can be affected'. 16 To conclude, it is highlighted that women and their spouses present mood alterations. The Tension and Fatigue subscales, although affecting the couple, their means differ significantly, while the Depression, Cholera and Vigor subscales show very close values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The women had moderately high levels on all three aspects of social support prior to diagnosis and there was little variation at the two subsequent measurement points. The stability of social support in the current analyses is inconsistent with the results from previous studies which showed levels of social support which either decreased within six months [218] or increased in the first 12 weeks of a social support intervention and then decreased [219]. Neither of these studies had pre-diagnosis measures, however, and their measurement timeframe was relatively short.…”
Section: Social Support By Socio-demographic Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Little evidence has been presented that examines either the longitudinal impact of social support on HRQOL in women with breast cancer, or changes over time in social support and HRQOL throughout the course of the disease. A small number of previous studies which have reported on patterns of social support associated with breast cancer have found that levels of social support fluctuated over time [218,219]. However, these studies did not have information on pre-diagnosis levels of social support and analyses were based on short follow-up times (up to 6 months).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%