The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.084802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Small Focus on Electron Heating and Proton Acceleration in Ultrarelativistic Laser-Solid Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the data shown in Figure 5, unfortunately the laser intensity on target was 20% of the typical intensity during this experiment, giving rise to a lower-than-expected maximum proton energy of 15.2 ± 0.4 MeV from PW laser irradiation of the Ti target without CW laser heating. For a typical laser intensity (I L ) of 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 , the maximum proton energy (E p ) can be estimated using the spot-size scaling [34] E p ∝ I L 1/4 , which gives E p~2 0 MeV. This calculation is supported by a previous result where a 5 µm steel tape target was irradiated at 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 without CW laser heating, under laser conditions comparable to the experiment presented here, and the measured maximum proton energy was in excess of 20 MeV [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of the data shown in Figure 5, unfortunately the laser intensity on target was 20% of the typical intensity during this experiment, giving rise to a lower-than-expected maximum proton energy of 15.2 ± 0.4 MeV from PW laser irradiation of the Ti target without CW laser heating. For a typical laser intensity (I L ) of 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 , the maximum proton energy (E p ) can be estimated using the spot-size scaling [34] E p ∝ I L 1/4 , which gives E p~2 0 MeV. This calculation is supported by a previous result where a 5 µm steel tape target was irradiated at 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 without CW laser heating, under laser conditions comparable to the experiment presented here, and the measured maximum proton energy was in excess of 20 MeV [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical laser intensity (I L ) of 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 , the maximum proton energy (E p ) can be estimated using the spot-size scaling [34] E p ∝ I L 1/4 , which gives E p~2 0 MeV. This calculation is supported by a previous result where a 5 µm steel tape target was irradiated at 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 without CW laser heating, under laser conditions comparable to the experiment presented here, and the measured maximum proton energy was in excess of 20 MeV [34]. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that PW laser irradiation at 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 of the Ti target without CW laser heating would generate a maximum proton energy in the region of~20 MeV, corresponding to a sheath potential of~20 MV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More than 50 MeV (Mega electron Volt) protons [49,50] were obtained with a laser intensity of~10 21 W/cm 2 . At the laser intensity of 5 × 10 21 W/cm 2 , the effect of using a small focus spot on electron heating and proton acceleration were investigated [51], and highly charged high-Z ions were accelerated to over GeV (Giga electron Volt) energies. Laser-plasma acceleration has the possibility to downsize conventional large-accelerator systems.…”
Section: Applications With the J-karen-p Laser Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fixed laser energy and pulse duration, maximizing the intensity by focusing to a near-wavelengthsized focal spot does not, however, necessarily result in higher-energy ions. Recent studies, involving relatively thick foils, have shown that self-generated magnetic fields [27] and unfavorable changes to the temperature and divergence of the energetic electron population injected into the foil [28] can result in lower-energy TNSA ions compared to that expected from intensity scaling laws.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%