The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of skull porosity on ultrasound transmission and wave mode conversion at large incidence angles

Abstract: Background Transcranial ultrasound imaging and therapy depend on the efficient transmission of acoustic energy through the skull. Multiple previous studies have concluded that a large incidence angle should be avoided during transcranial‐focused ultrasound therapy to ensure transmission through the skull. Alternatively, some other studies have shown that longitudinal‐to‐shear wave mode conversion might improve transmission through the skull when the incidence angle is increased above the critical angle (i.e., … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, during the focusing process, the acoustic waves in the skull are dominated by longitudinal waves. The attenuation of the shear wave in the skull is much higher than that of the compression wave, so the shear wave is usually not used as a focusing wave considering shear waves in the skull model can accurately estimate the energy of the focal point [ 44 ].…”
Section: Modeling Methods and Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, during the focusing process, the acoustic waves in the skull are dominated by longitudinal waves. The attenuation of the shear wave in the skull is much higher than that of the compression wave, so the shear wave is usually not used as a focusing wave considering shear waves in the skull model can accurately estimate the energy of the focal point [ 44 ].…”
Section: Modeling Methods and Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase correction results showed varying performance among the four skull models, which may be influenced by multiple factors, including the incident angle, skull density ratio (SDR), and size of the skull. Among these factors, the incident angle and SDR are two significant factors that have been widely studied (Chang et al 2016, Jung et al 2019, Schoen and Arvanitis 2020, Jing et al 2023. It is well known that shear-wave propagation plays an important role when the incident angle large than 20° (White et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the progress made in the noninvasive deep brain ablation surgery based on MRIguided ultrasound focusing (MRgFUS), 10 has brought good news to patients with various brain diseases, such as essential tremor. However, although ultrasound has the advantages of non-invasive, high spatiotemporal resolution, the reflection, scattering, and elastic wave mode conversion of ultrasound by the skull will seriously affect the energy transmission and sound field distribution of transcranial ultrasound, 11 for example, the incidence angle, skull properties (e.g., porosity) can affect mode conversion, thereby reducing the transmission of ultrasound, [12][13][14] making it necessary to open the skull for high-resolution ultrasound imaging, and precise deep brain ablation requires expensive, complex, and huge ultrasound phase array technology. 15 How to overcome the influence of the skull on ultrasound is a major problem in the field of transcranial high-resolution ultrasound imaging and precise modulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%