Effect of Sit-To-Stand Training versus Manual Strengthening Exercises on Mobility and Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Cerebral palsy poses significant challenges to mobility and function in affected children. This study addresses the need for evidence-based rehabilitation interventions by comparing the impact of sit-to-stand training and manual strengthening exercises. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of sit-to-stand training and manual strengthening exercises in improving mobility and function in children with cerebral palsy. Method: A randomized controlled trial involving 44 participants (22 in each group) was conducted. Baseline characteristics were assessed, and interventions were implemented over a 12-week period. Regular assessments tracked changes, employing statistical analyses to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Both interventions led to positive changes, with a statistically significant superiority favoring the Sit-to-Stand Group at the 12-week mark. Baseline comparability was established, reinforcing the credibility of the findings. Conclusion: Sit-to-stand training, emphasizing weight-bearing activities, demonstrated notable efficacy in enhancing mobility and function. The study provides valuable insights for clinicians, guiding evidence-based practices in pediatric rehabilitation.