2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/8/317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of SiO2and SiC doping on the powder-in-tube processed MgB2tapes

Abstract: Effect of SiO 2 and SiC nano-powder doping was investigated for the powder-in-tube processed MgB 2 /Fe tapes. Mg or MgH 2 powder was used as the Mg source of starting materials, and heat treatment was carried out at 600 • C for 1 h. These heat treatment conditions of lower temperature and shorter heating time are advantageous from the aspect of practical production processes. MgH 2 powder improved the connection of MgB 2 grains and prevented oxidation of MgB 2 . SiC and SiO 2 doping greatly enhanced the critic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
150
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
14
150
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the large coherence length of MgB 2 many nano-particles at grain boundaries do not cause weak links but act as effective pinning centres which has been well demonstrated by a number of doping studies [7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In the case of Fe doping, FeB particles at grain boundaries cause grain decoupling because FeB particle scattering affects a much larger volume surrounding the particle than nonmagnetic particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of the large coherence length of MgB 2 many nano-particles at grain boundaries do not cause weak links but act as effective pinning centres which has been well demonstrated by a number of doping studies [7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In the case of Fe doping, FeB particles at grain boundaries cause grain decoupling because FeB particle scattering affects a much larger volume surrounding the particle than nonmagnetic particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The exceptional properties of SiC as a dopant have been verified by a number of groups over the past few years. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] However SiC doping was found to have some negative effect on J c in the low field region. The J c for SiC doped MgB 2 was lower than that for undoped MgB 2 below 4 T at 5 K and below 2.5 T at 20 K. 2,13,17 There are many applications in the low field region such as in open magnetic resonance imaging ͑MRI͒ transformers and electric cables which normally operate at around 1-3 T. Thus it is important that the enhancement of J c by SiC doping can be extended to include all the field regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, the relatively larger ξ of MgB 2 (about 5-10 nm) allows optimum pinning by nparticles for enhancement of the J c (H) performance. Although this effect has been studied for a variety of different nano-particle additives, e.g., n-Dy 2 O 3 [10], n-SiO 2 [11], n-carbon [2,4], n-tubes of carbon [3] and n-diamond [5], the best performance yet seen, is with nanosized carbon derivatives. In fact it might be interesting to inter-compare the high field critical current (J c ,H) behaviour resulting from carbon, when substituted for boron (MgB 2-x C x ) with that when it (or its derivatives) are introduced as additive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%