2006
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Single Oral Doses of Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, on Incretin and Plasma Glucose Levels after an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: In this study in patients with type 2 diabetes, near maximal glucose-lowering efficacy of sitagliptin after single oral doses was associated with inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity of 80% or greater, corresponding to a plasma sitagliptin concentration of 100 nm or greater, and an augmentation of active GLP-1 and GIP levels of 2-fold or higher after an OGTT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

55
426
13
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 476 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
55
426
13
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in the halflife of liraglutide is most likely to be mediated via a lower susceptibility to metabolism by DPP-IV [20] and a high degree of albumin binding of liraglutide (as has been shown for other fatty acid derivatives [21,22]); moreover, after subcutaneous administration, an additional prolongation of the half-life is mediated by slow absorption of liraglutide from the injection site, as evidenced by the further increase in half-life observed with subcutaneous vs intravenous administration. Thus, liraglutide treatment probably induces much higher plasma levels compared with native GLP-1 concentration in plasma [19,23,24]. Therefore, the concentration of liraglutide required to produce beneficial effects in HUVECs (0.1 μg/ml=26.6 nmol/l) might be achievable with the therapeutic doses used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in the halflife of liraglutide is most likely to be mediated via a lower susceptibility to metabolism by DPP-IV [20] and a high degree of albumin binding of liraglutide (as has been shown for other fatty acid derivatives [21,22]); moreover, after subcutaneous administration, an additional prolongation of the half-life is mediated by slow absorption of liraglutide from the injection site, as evidenced by the further increase in half-life observed with subcutaneous vs intravenous administration. Thus, liraglutide treatment probably induces much higher plasma levels compared with native GLP-1 concentration in plasma [19,23,24]. Therefore, the concentration of liraglutide required to produce beneficial effects in HUVECs (0.1 μg/ml=26.6 nmol/l) might be achievable with the therapeutic doses used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it was shown that good glycemic control could be achieved with lower sulfonylurea doses by administering sitagliptin. These results suggest that β‐cell function is actually well activated with combined use of sulfonylurea drugs and DPP‐4 inhibitors, although the effect of sitagliptin to lower glucagon 4 might also contribute to the reduced sulfonylurea doses. It is coming to be understood that incretin not only promotes the insulin release reaction in β‐cells 5,23 , but it also stimulates the insulin secretion response through multiple actions 24 , such as promoting adenosine triphosphate generation in mitochondria 25 , and both sulfonylurea and incretin act on exchange protein directly activated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate 2A in β‐cells 26,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In patients with type 2 diabetes, Ն80% inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity with single doses of sitagliptin produced twoto threefold increases in active GLP-1 and GIP levels, increased insulin and Cpeptide levels, reduced plasma glucagon levels, and reduced glycemic excursion following an oral glucose tolerance test (9). Two 12-week studies in patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrated that sitagliptin dose-dependently reduced HbA 1c (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), with a neutral effect on body weight and incidences of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse experiences similar to placebo (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%