2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of single and dual-modifications on stability and structural characteristics of foxtail millet starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the dual physical modification, also referred to as the synergistic effect of physical modification, is very promising because it can improve the properties of starch without involving the use of chemical reagents. The literature included dual modification by annealing and ultra-sonication treatments on potato starch [11], and heat-moisture combined with high pressure treatment of foxtail millet starch [12], etc. Previous reports also pointed out that dual physical modification is more effective than a single treatment, e.g., potato starch had a higher oil absorption capacity after a combination of ultrasound and freeze-thaw cycle treatment than ultrasonic or freeze-thaw cycle treatment alone [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the dual physical modification, also referred to as the synergistic effect of physical modification, is very promising because it can improve the properties of starch without involving the use of chemical reagents. The literature included dual modification by annealing and ultra-sonication treatments on potato starch [11], and heat-moisture combined with high pressure treatment of foxtail millet starch [12], etc. Previous reports also pointed out that dual physical modification is more effective than a single treatment, e.g., potato starch had a higher oil absorption capacity after a combination of ultrasound and freeze-thaw cycle treatment than ultrasonic or freeze-thaw cycle treatment alone [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amylose–amylose interactions, which are considerably stronger than those of amylose–amylopectin or amylopectin–amylopectin, may restrict the accessibility of starch chains to enzyme action . The resistance to enzymatic digestion is also afforded by the interactions between amylose and amylopectin which provide starch a regular arrangement in the crystalline region . Furthermore, the amylose–lipid complex is proposed as resistant starch type 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent amylose content was measured by the method of Babu et al. [ 26 ] with minor modifications. 20 mg dry starch was added to 8 mL 90% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution, which was shaken violently for 20 min and then transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask for volume determination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%