1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(94)00010-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of single and combined altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency at two speech rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous studies we have demonstrated that when instructed to speak at a self-imposed 'normal' rate, individuals who stutter generate rates that are comparable to normal conversational speech rates of fluent speakers. [19][20][21][22] Although purely speculative, it may be the case that following prolonged exposure (i.e., in excess of four months) to AAF, stuttering episode duration is reduced which may lead to the perception of more natural sounding speech despite the fact that the total number of dysfluencies remain the same across samples. Stuttering episode duration has been observed to decrease under conditions of DAF and FAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous studies we have demonstrated that when instructed to speak at a self-imposed 'normal' rate, individuals who stutter generate rates that are comparable to normal conversational speech rates of fluent speakers. [19][20][21][22] Although purely speculative, it may be the case that following prolonged exposure (i.e., in excess of four months) to AAF, stuttering episode duration is reduced which may lead to the perception of more natural sounding speech despite the fact that the total number of dysfluencies remain the same across samples. Stuttering episode duration has been observed to decrease under conditions of DAF and FAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We continue to offer that not all individuals respond favorably to AAF. Our previous studies 8, [19][20][21][22][25][26][27] and others 24,28,39 have shown varying levels of stuttering reduction under various AAF conditions. Further, in some AAF conditions, spontaneous speech from those who stutter is not judged to be natural.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAF is effective during both reading and spontaneous speech tasks, as well as in traditionally difficult situations such as using the telephone and speaking in front of audience (Armson et al, 2006;. Because of the need to control variables, most researchers have investigated the effects of AAF on stuttering while participants read (Armson, Foote, Witt, Kalinowski, & Stuart, 1997;Ham & Steer, 1967;Kalinowski, Stuart, Wamsley, & Rastatter, 1999;MacLeod et al, 1995;Maraist & Hutton, 1957;. Typically the effectiveness of AAF during reading tasks is assessed by measuring percentage of stuttered syllables (%SS) while participants are reading a short passage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,18 Although Howell et al 16 reported FAF to be more effective than DAF in inhibiting stuttering, others have reported DAF and FAF to be equally effective. 18,25 Traditionally these forms of altered auditory feedback have been generated by electronic signal processing devices, however, passive mechanical devices may produce altered auditory feedback effects as well. 29 The mean in which altered auditory feedback inhibits stuttering remains undetermined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%