The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of siderophores on the light-induced dissolution of colloidal iron(III) (hydr)oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on the dissolution of colloidal Fe (hydr)oxides show that oxalate is a suitable ligand because of the formation of surface ternary complex Fe(III)oxide-oxalate-Fe(II) acting as an electron bridge for electron transfer from Fe(III) to Fe(II) (Sulzberger et al 1989). Oxalate solution, as used in this study, can result in significant Fe(hydr)oxides dissolution by three pathways acting synergistically (Sulzberger et al 1989, Borer et al 2005): (1) surface chelation, (2) Fe(II)-catalyzed dissolution in the presence of other chelating agent (e.g., EDTA), and (3) light-induced dissolution in presence of electron donor (e.g., oxalate). In this case, the Fe desorption efficiency could not be predicted solely using the Eigen-Wilkens theory and the affinity of the washing agent for Fe(III), as opposed to previous observations for other transition metals (Hassler et al 2004).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the dissolution of colloidal Fe (hydr)oxides show that oxalate is a suitable ligand because of the formation of surface ternary complex Fe(III)oxide-oxalate-Fe(II) acting as an electron bridge for electron transfer from Fe(III) to Fe(II) (Sulzberger et al 1989). Oxalate solution, as used in this study, can result in significant Fe(hydr)oxides dissolution by three pathways acting synergistically (Sulzberger et al 1989, Borer et al 2005): (1) surface chelation, (2) Fe(II)-catalyzed dissolution in the presence of other chelating agent (e.g., EDTA), and (3) light-induced dissolution in presence of electron donor (e.g., oxalate). In this case, the Fe desorption efficiency could not be predicted solely using the Eigen-Wilkens theory and the affinity of the washing agent for Fe(III), as opposed to previous observations for other transition metals (Hassler et al 2004).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the membrane permeability of diatoms might have changed, although the heat-killed cells were kept intact (observed under the microscope). In addition, Fe dissociation from the cell surface might be overestimated because of DFB competition binding (Borer et al 2005). However, Fe release from the intracellular compartments of living cells was not affected because neither the DFB-Fe complex (Wells 1999;Kuma et al 2000) nor DFB was directly bioavailable, at least for this algal species.…”
Section: Fe Efflux Under Different Temperatures and Irradiances-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gradient results from the increased input of Fe at coastal margins from river outflow and the upwelling of suspended shelf sediments (Bruland et al 1991;Kuma et al 1996). Rivers can indirectly supply dissolved Fe to nearshore ecosystems by exporting Fe-rich particles to the coastal shelf area that are subsequently upwelled to the surface (Johnson et al 1999), where Fe may be remineralized from these particles in the presence of light and Febinding ligands (Borer et al 2005). The upwelling of bottom boundary layer (BBL) sediments, particularly from midshelf mudbelt deposits (Xu et al 2002), has been identified as the predominant source of Fe to shelf surface waters along the California coast (Johnson et al 1999;Fitzwater et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%