2022
DOI: 10.3390/v14040704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Short Time of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Caco-2 Cells

Abstract: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) clinical manifestations include the involvement of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting around 10% of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected children. In the present work, the consequence of a short time of viral absorption (5, 15, 30 and 60 min) was tested on the Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cell line. Our findings show that Caco-2 cells are highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, even after 5 min of viral inoculation at a multiplicity of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2E” in Shuai et al (2020) , respectively. The absence of cytopathic effect during SARS-CoV-2 infection in Caco-2 cells was also reported in multiple studies by other research groups ( Wurtz et al, 2021 ; Zupin et al, 2022 ; Alexander et al, 2020 ; Bartolomeo et al, 2022 ; Saccon et al, 2021 ), including results for the Delta ( Mautner et al, 2022 ) and the Omicron ( Dighe et al, 2022 ) variants.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…2E” in Shuai et al (2020) , respectively. The absence of cytopathic effect during SARS-CoV-2 infection in Caco-2 cells was also reported in multiple studies by other research groups ( Wurtz et al, 2021 ; Zupin et al, 2022 ; Alexander et al, 2020 ; Bartolomeo et al, 2022 ; Saccon et al, 2021 ), including results for the Delta ( Mautner et al, 2022 ) and the Omicron ( Dighe et al, 2022 ) variants.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…No relative increase in these cytokines/chemokines was observed in Calu-3 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Shuai et al, 2020). Other authors suggest that the absence of CPE in Caco-2 could be due to the weak proinflammatory response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 (Zupin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Cancer Coli 2 Cells (Caco-2)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The absence of CPE in Caco-2 cells is suggested at least for low multiplicity of infections (MOIs) (Chu et al, 2020;Saccon et al, 2021;Wurtz et al, 2021;Mautner et al, 2022;Zupin et al, 2022) and this is its main disadvantage compared to Vero E6 cells. Furthermore, unlike Calu-3 cells, SARS-CoV-2 viral production by Caco-2 cells typically reaches levels similar to or higher than those seen in Vero E6 cells (Figure 2) (Chu et al, 2020;Koch et al, 2021;Saccon et al, 2021;de Souza et al, 2022).…”
Section: Cancer Coli 2 Cells (Caco-2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering all previous studies on different viruses and the current data on SARS-CoV-2, we aimed at dissecting the role of EGFR–RAS–MAPK axis in viral infection. First, we monitored MAPK activation in response to a treatment with His-tagged recombinant spike receptor binding domain (Spike-RBD) in Caco-2 cells, which have high level of ACE2 ( Fig S1A ), express ADAM17 , TMPRSS2 and FURIN ( Fig S1B ) that were previously described as key players in viral infection, and are highly permissive for SARS-CoV-2 ( Zupin et al, 2022 ) ( Fig S1C ). Spike-RBD treatment led to an increased activation of the key mediators of MAPK signaling, such as ERK1/2 and CRAF, after 10 min of incubation, whereas at later time points, activation returned to a basal level ( Fig 1A and B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%