2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Short-term Integrated Palliative Care on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients Severely Affected With Long-term Neurological Conditions

Abstract: This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effect of short-term integrated palliative care vs standard care among patients severely affected by long-term neurological conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 To summarize, Latorraca et al found no evidence of differences between intervention and control groups > 6 months post-intervention and concluded they are uncertain whether PCIs are beneficial for people with MS in the setting of low-or very low-certainty evidence regarding the difference between PCI versus usual care for long-term health-related quality of life, adverse events, and hospital admission in patients with MS. 15 Thus, all 4 review author teams reported the same conclusion: more quantitative research investigating PCI is needed to provide evidence for clinical practice. Two phase III RCTs investigating PCI in adults with PCNSDs using patient-reported outcomes and caregiver-reported outcomes to assess PCI effectiveness were published in 2020, containing 964 total participants (560 patients and 404 caregivers), 24,25 warranting initiation of an updated systematic review.…”
Section: Sampson Et Al's 2005 Systematic Review and Murphy Et Al's 2016 Cochrane Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…15 To summarize, Latorraca et al found no evidence of differences between intervention and control groups > 6 months post-intervention and concluded they are uncertain whether PCIs are beneficial for people with MS in the setting of low-or very low-certainty evidence regarding the difference between PCI versus usual care for long-term health-related quality of life, adverse events, and hospital admission in patients with MS. 15 Thus, all 4 review author teams reported the same conclusion: more quantitative research investigating PCI is needed to provide evidence for clinical practice. Two phase III RCTs investigating PCI in adults with PCNSDs using patient-reported outcomes and caregiver-reported outcomes to assess PCI effectiveness were published in 2020, containing 964 total participants (560 patients and 404 caregivers), 24,25 warranting initiation of an updated systematic review.…”
Section: Sampson Et Al's 2005 Systematic Review and Murphy Et Al's 2016 Cochrane Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another RCT published results and analyses in 2 different publications. 25,34 Three Cochrane review [14][15][16] and 1 systematic review 17 were also identified and screened for any additional RCTs. One RCT 22 met this review's inclusion/exclusion criteria, yielding a total of 5 RCTs for qualitative synthesis.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations