2001
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2001.1527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Short-term and Long-term Preservation on Motion Characteristics of Garole Ram Spermatozoa: A Prolific Microsheep Breed of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, severe reduction in the sperm motility was observed for the EYMG followed by EYC and EYCF compared with the TCEYF extender. The much lower sperm motility observed in case of EYMG extended epididymal spermatozoa in the present study might be due to the variation in the source of spermatozoa (cauda epididymidis), breeds of ram and processing procedure (double centrifugation) before extension and preservation than the report of Joshi et al. (2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, severe reduction in the sperm motility was observed for the EYMG followed by EYC and EYCF compared with the TCEYF extender. The much lower sperm motility observed in case of EYMG extended epididymal spermatozoa in the present study might be due to the variation in the source of spermatozoa (cauda epididymidis), breeds of ram and processing procedure (double centrifugation) before extension and preservation than the report of Joshi et al. (2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Except the TCEYF, other three extenders showed much lower sperm motility than the previous works done with EYC extender for preservation of epididymal spermatozoa (Lone et al. 2011) and EYC (Islam and Khan 2010), EYMG (Joshi et al. 2001) and Cornell University Extender (George et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Mittal and Ghosh, 1979;Galil and Galil, 1982;Ibrahim, 1997). The CASA technique provides precise and validated objective sperm motion characteristics (Holt and Palomo, 1996) and has been extensively applied for ram spermatozoa (Edward et al, 1995;Briggs et al, 1996;Joshi et al, 2001;2003;2005;Bag et al, 2002;2004;Kumar et al, 2007;2010); however, care must be taken in preparation of the sample and choosing settings of the instrument (Davis and Siemers, 1995). Davis and Katz (1992; reported that results of CASA are inaccurate if the sperm count for analysis, is below 20 Â 10 6 sperm/ml or above 50 Â 10 6 sperm/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%