1989
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0681612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Short-Chain Fatty Acids on Voluntary Feed of Broiler Chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected inhibitory effect of dietary supplementation with acetic or propionic acids on feed intake of broiler chicks [5,6,8,9] was also evident in the current study. The most prominent consequence of anorectant supplementation was its pronounced allevia- 112 Pinchasov/Elmaliah Dietary Anorectants and Blood Metabolites tion of feed intake, resulting in decreased body weight gain and AAT weight ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected inhibitory effect of dietary supplementation with acetic or propionic acids on feed intake of broiler chicks [5,6,8,9] was also evident in the current study. The most prominent consequence of anorectant supplementation was its pronounced allevia- 112 Pinchasov/Elmaliah Dietary Anorectants and Blood Metabolites tion of feed intake, resulting in decreased body weight gain and AAT weight ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The inhibitory effect of these acids on feed intake is assumed to result from intervention in some metabolic pathways. The idea that metabolic events contribute to the control of feed intake is widely accepted [5][6][7][22][23][24][25][26][27], although the mechanism un derlying such metabolic signals is not clear. Langhans et al [23] concluded, from a se lective hepatic vagotomy study with rats, that the hypophagic effect of pyruvate, lactate, glycerol, and malate is mediated through he patic neural structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this experiment are consistent with the findings of , who indicated that the dietary addition of fumaric acid did not affect WG of broilers, but did improve FCR. On the other hand, Pinchasov & Jensen (1989) reported that butyric acid, unlike other acids such as propionic acid, did not reduce feed intake. In the current study, the addition …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The inclusion of 0.2% or 0.3% butyric acid did not influence broiler chickens' BWG, FI, or FCR at the whole period of the experiment (Mahdavi and Torki 2009). It has been suggested that in case of well-nourished healthy chicks housing at a moderate stoking density and hygienic condition, dietary inclusion of MCFAs or SCFAs was ineffective on the birds' performance (Pinchasov and Jensen 1989). Free butyric acid is absorbed very quickly in the upper digestive tract, and will likely be of limited use other than as a feed sanitizer, and, unlike other acids such as propionate, did not depress FI (Pinchasov and Jensen 1989).…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%