1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(97)00252-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sherwood number on critical constants of diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the catalyst porosity arrangement method: (0.3, 0.7), the maximum Sherwood number is obtained in the last half of the channels. The Sherwood number represents the effectiveness of mass convection at the surface (van Zee et al, 1997;Sagiv et al, 1998). The flow rate of the reforming reactants may change the relative ratio of the maximum Sherwood numbers, which will eventually lead to the change of the mass transfer characteristics of the reactor.…”
Section: Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the catalyst porosity arrangement method: (0.3, 0.7), the maximum Sherwood number is obtained in the last half of the channels. The Sherwood number represents the effectiveness of mass convection at the surface (van Zee et al, 1997;Sagiv et al, 1998). The flow rate of the reforming reactants may change the relative ratio of the maximum Sherwood numbers, which will eventually lead to the change of the mass transfer characteristics of the reactor.…”
Section: Rementioning
confidence: 99%